Myocardial function recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: the role of global longitudinal strain and myocardial work - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Recovery of Myocardial Function in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Insights from Global Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Work Analysis

  • By

  • Federica Ilardi

  • Federica Carusone

  • Dario D’Alconzo

  • Rachele Manzo

  • Alessia Palmentieri

  • Ciro Battaglia

  • Dalila Nappa

  • Giuseppe Giugliano

  • Raffaella Lombardi

  • Santo Dellegrottaglie

  • Viviana Narciso

  • Roberta Paolillo

  • Luca Bardi

  • Francesco S. Loffredo

  • Daniele Masarone

  • Enrica Pezzullo

  • Francesca Lanni

  • Donato Gerardi

  • Eugenio Stabile

  • Angelicarosa Cascone

  • Nouha Azaza

  • Giovanni Peretto

  • Giuseppe Bifulco

  • Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo

  • Gabriele Saccone

  • Alaide Chieffo

  • Cinzia Perrino

  • Giovanni Esposito

  • August 26, 2026

Share

Recovery of Myocardial Function in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

Overview

This study investigates myocardial recovery in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) using global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work (MW) indices. Findings indicate that while some women experience recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), subtle myocardial impairments persist.

Background

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare but serious condition that can lead to heart failure during or after pregnancy. Approximately 50% of women recover their LVEF, but many may still experience residual myocardial dysfunction.

Data Highlights

GroupLVEFGLSGWE
Group A (<50% LVEF)ImpairedSignificantly poorerNot applicable
Group B (≥50% LVEF)RecoveredLower than controls (18.0 ± 3.1% vs. 21.8 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001)Lower than controls (92.6 ± 6.0 vs. 95.9 ± 2.0%, p = 0.023)
Group C (Controls)NormalNormalNormal

Key Findings

  • 72.7% of women with PPCM showed LV recovery.
  • Groups A and B had greater LV diameters and volumes compared to controls (p < 0.001).
  • Group A exhibited significantly poorer GLS and MW parameters (p < 0.001 for all).
  • Group B had lower GLS and GWE compared to controls despite LVEF recovery (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively).
  • GLS and MW indices may reveal myocardial impairment not detected by conventional measures.

Clinical Implications

The study presents GLS and MW indices as measures of myocardial performance in PPCM patients.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that GLS and MW indices may detect residual myocardial dysfunction in PPCM.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2025 -- Implications of Non-Invasive Myocardial Work Assessment in Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Devices
  2. Pediatric Cardiology, 2025 -- Impact of Pacing Site and Heart Rate Variability on Non-invasive Myocardial Stroke Work in Adolescents
  3. Pediatric Cardiology, 2017 -- Sustained Myocardial Deformation Following Successful Repair of Coarctation: Insights from a CMR Feature-Tracking Analysis
  4. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology -- A comprehensive analysis of the impact of high-intensity interval vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on global and regional myocardial function in patients early after acute myocardial infarction-the STRAICT randomized controlled trial
  5. Prognostic value of various markers in recovery from peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis - PMC
  6. Contemporary guidelines on peripartum cardiomyopathy
  7. Prognostic value of various markers in recovery from peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis - PMC
  8. Immune dysregulation as a key driver of peripartum cardiomyopathy – an exploratory advanced imaging and biomarker study - Hoevelmann - 2025 - European Journal of Heart Failure - Wiley Online Library

Original Source(s)

Related Content