Molecular predictors of minimal residual disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with quadruplet therapy - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Molecular Factors Associated With Minimal Residual Disease in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma After Quadruplet Therapy

  • By

  • Florence Magrangeas

  • Mia Cherkaoui

  • Victor Bessonneau-Gaborit

  • Jennifer Derrien

  • Céline Chevalier

  • Catherine Guérin-Charbonnel

  • Benjamin Diamond

  • Mehmet Kemal Samur

  • Cyrille Hulin

  • Denis Caillot

  • Lionel Karlin

  • Bertrand Arnulf

  • Ola Landgren

  • Nikhil C. Munshi

  • Hervé Avet-Loiseau

  • Ludovic Martinet

  • Jill Corre

  • Aurore Perrot

  • Philippe Moreau

  • Cyrille Touzeau

  • Stéphane Minvielle

  • Eric Letouzé

  • October 19, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Molecular Factors Associated With MRD After Quadruplet Therapy

Overview

This MIDAS ancillary study profiled 423 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) using genomic, transcriptomic, and DNA methylation methods; 416 had all three data types available. The study was designed to characterize molecular features and identify factors associated with measurable residual disease (MRD) after Isa-KRd induction, but the supplied article excerpt does not report the MRD-associated results.

Background

Multiple myeloma is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous plasma-cell malignancy, and genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic features provide complementary information about its biology and clinical outcomes. Quadruplet regimens combining an anti-CD38 antibody, proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and dexamethasone are described in the source as the standard induction approach for NDMM. MRD, assessed by deep sequencing or flow cytometry, is a sensitive response measure and an early endpoint associated with progression-free and overall survival. The MIDAS trial evaluates MRD-guided consolidation and maintenance after standardized Isa-KRd induction.

Data Highlights

MeasureReported data
Molecular characterization cohort423 patients with NDMM
MIDAS enrollment394 of 423 screened patients
Whole-genome sequencing421 samples; mean depth 46× tumor DNA and 27× normal DNA
RNA sequencing418 samples; mean 66 million read pairs per sample
Whole-genome enzymatic methylation sequencing422 samples; mean depth 13×
All three molecular data typesAvailable for 416 samples
Normal plasma-cell reference samplesFive samples assessed by RNA-seq and WGEM-seq

Key Findings

  • The ancillary study integrated whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and whole-genome enzymatic methylation sequencing in a uniformly treated MIDAS cohort.
  • Baseline molecular characterization included all 423 screened patients; analyses of molecular predictors of MRD were restricted to the 394 enrolled patients.
  • After quality control, molecular profiles were available for 421 WGS, 418 RNA-seq, and 422 WGEM-seq samples; 416 had all three data types.
  • Unsupervised gene-expression classification identified eight molecular groups that were strongly associated with genomic alterations and corresponded to previously reported transcriptomic subgroups.
  • The MS, MF, and CD expression groups were defined by driver translocations activating NSD2, MAF/MAFA/MAFB, and CCND1, respectively.
  • The supplied excerpt states that the study sought molecular predictors of MRD after Isa-KRd induction but does not provide the resulting MRD associations or their effect estimates.

Clinical Implications

The study design supports integrated assessment of molecular features in a cohort receiving standardized quadruplet induction, with MRD-predictor analyses limited to enrolled patients. The supplied excerpt does not provide specific molecular predictors or results that would support a change in clinical management.

Conclusion

The MIDAS ancillary study established a multiomic characterization cohort of patients with NDMM treated with Isa-KRd and identified eight expression groups linked to genomic alterations. The excerpt does not include the study’s findings on molecular factors associated with post-induction MRD.

Related Resources & Content

  1. MIDAS ancillary study, source article excerpt, year not provided — Molecular Factors Associated With Minimal Residual Disease in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma After Quadruplet Therapy
  2. NCCN, JNCCN, 2026 — Multiple Myeloma, Version 5.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
  3. EHA–EMN, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2025 — Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma
  4. ASCO Publications — Minimal residual disease dynamics in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and impact on progression-free survival: A cohort study.
  5. ASCO Publications — Minimal Residual Disease After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant for Patients With Myeloma: Prognostic Significance and the Impact of Lenalidomide Maintenance and Molecular Risk
  6. ASCO Publications — Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma
  7. ASCO Publications — Minimal residual disease dynamics in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and impact on progression-free survival: A cohort study.
  8. Multiple Myeloma, Version 5.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
  9. EHA–EMN Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma
  10. Multiple Myeloma, Version 5.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology - PubMed
  11. EHA–EMN Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma | Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  12. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma | New England Journal of Medicine
  13. Daratumumab in transplant-ineligible or -deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: minimal residual disease in CEPHEUS - PMC
  14. Daratumumab with lenalidomide as maintenance after transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the AURIGA study - PMC
  15. Minimal Residual Disease–Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials | Journal of Clinical Oncology
  16. Evaluating Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as a Surrogate Endpoint for Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content