Distinct trajectories of low anterior resection syndrome following ileostomy reversal - Report - MDSpire

Distinct trajectories of low anterior resection syndrome following ileostomy reversal

  • By

  • Xuena Zhang

  • Qingyu Meng

  • Jingru Wang

  • Simeng Jiang

  • Zhongtao Tian

  • Zihan Fan

  • Tong Wang

  • Wenbo Niu

  • June 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Diverse Patterns of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Reversal of Ileostomy

Overview

This study assesses low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms in rectal cancer patients post-ileostomy reversal, identifying three distinct symptom trajectories. Key clinical factors influencing these trajectories include T stage, anastomotic height, and preoperative radiotherapy.

Background

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a common complication following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, characterized by bowel dysfunction symptoms. This study utilizes group-based trajectory modeling to analyze these trajectories in a cohort of rectal cancer patients.

Data Highlights

Trajectory GroupPercentage of Patients
Mild and Recovering30.6%
Moderate and Fluctuating40.3%
Severe and Persistent29.1%

Key Findings

  • Three distinct LARS symptom trajectories identified: mild and recovering, moderate and fluctuating, severe and persistent.
  • 30.6% of patients fell into the mild trajectory, with most improving by 12 months.
  • 40.3% experienced moderate and fluctuating symptoms.
  • 29.1% had severe and persistent symptoms, with nearly half still experiencing major LARS at 12 months.
  • Higher T stage, lower anastomotic height, and preoperative radiotherapy were associated with worse symptom trajectories.
  • Symptom severity differed significantly among the three groups at all time points (P < 0.001).

Clinical Implications

Recognizing the clinical factors associated with LARS trajectories may assist healthcare providers in understanding patient recovery patterns.

Conclusion

The study identifies distinct LARS symptom trajectories in rectal cancer patients post-ileostomy reversal, highlighting the role of specific clinical factors.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Enhancing Functional Results in Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer, Springer, 2020 -- Enhancing Functional Results in Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer
  2. Evaluation of Extraction Site Versus Alternative Location for Protective Loop Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection, Springer, 2023 -- Evaluation of Extraction Site Versus Alternative Location for Protective Loop Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection
  3. Complications Associated with Closure of Defunctioning Ileostomy Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis and Low Colonic Anastomosis, Springer, 2011 -- Complications Associated with Closure of Defunctioning Ileostomy Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis and Low Colonic Anastomosis
  4. International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, PMC, 2020 -- International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  5. Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient, PMC, 2026 -- Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient
  6. Therapeutic strategies for low anterior resection syndrome: an umbrella review of systematic reviews, PMC, 2025 -- Therapeutic strategies for low anterior resection syndrome: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
  7. International Journal of Colorectal Disease — Anastomotic configurations and early endoscopic recurrence following ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
  8. International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome - PMC
  9. Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient - PMC
  10. Therapeutic strategies for low anterior resection syndrome: an umbrella review of systematic reviews - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content