Implementation of a patient blood management in an Italian City Hospital: is it effective in reducing the use of red blood cells? - Report - MDSpire

Implementation of a patient blood management in an Italian City Hospital: is it effective in reducing the use of red blood cells?

  • By

  • Giorgio Ercolani

  • Leonardo Solaini

  • Fabrizio D’Acapito

  • Claudio Isopi

  • Carlo Alberto Pacilio

  • Cinzia Moretti

  • Vanessa Agostini

  • Alessandro Cucchetti

  • October 30, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Effectiveness of Patient Blood Management in Reducing Transfusions in Italian Hospital

Overview

Implementation of a patient blood management (PBM) program at an Italian city hospital significantly reduced red blood cell transfusion rates in abdominal surgery patients, particularly in liver surgery. The program promoted restrictive transfusion triggers and single-unit transfusions without increasing postoperative complications.

Background

Blood transfusions are frequently required in general, cardiac, and orthopedic surgeries, with up to 30% of major abdominal surgery patients needing transfusions. While lifesaving during uncontrolled bleeding, transfusions are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in oncologic surgeries. Patient blood management (PBM) strategies aim to reduce transfusion use and improve anemia tolerance, but most data on PBM effectiveness come from North America. This study evaluates PBM implementation effects in an Italian hospital setting.

Data Highlights

ParameterPre-PBMPost-PBMp-value
Number of patients445857
Minimally invasive surgery rate31.5%38%0.025
Median preoperative Hb (non-transfused)13.2 g/dL (12–14.2)13.1 g/dL (11.9–14.3)<0.001
Median preoperative Hb (transfused)10.3 g/dL (9.4–11.9)10.4 g/dL (9.4–11.6)<0.001
Transfusion rate in liver surgerySignificantly decreasedLower rateSignificant
Single-unit transfusion adoption in gastric surgery7.7%55%0.049
Single-unit transfusion adoption in liver surgery17.6%58.3%0.04

Key Findings

  • After PBM implementation, the number of transfused patients per year significantly decreased.
  • Transfusion rates decreased notably in liver and gastric surgeries, with a strong trend in pancreatic surgery; colorectal surgery rates remained unchanged.
  • Preoperative hemoglobin was significantly higher in patients who did not require transfusions in both pre- and post-PBM groups.
  • The adoption of a single-unit transfusion strategy increased significantly post-PBM, especially in gastric and liver surgeries.
  • Postoperative complication rates remained similar before and after PBM implementation, indicating safety of the restrictive transfusion approach.

Clinical Implications

The PBM program effectively reduced red blood cell transfusions without increasing postoperative complications, supporting restrictive transfusion triggers and single-unit transfusions as safe practices. Preoperative optimization of hemoglobin levels remains critical to minimize transfusion needs. These findings encourage wider adoption of PBM protocols in abdominal oncologic surgeries to improve patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The introduction of a multidisciplinary PBM program in an Italian hospital significantly lowered transfusion rates in abdominal surgery patients, particularly in liver resections, without compromising postoperative outcomes. This supports PBM as an effective strategy to optimize blood use and patient safety.

References

  1. Gruttadauria et al. 2018 -- Impact of Blood Transfusion on Liver Surgery Outcomes
  2. PBM Guidelines and Implementation Studies 2010-2020

Original Source(s)

Related Content