Minimally invasive, robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors: a case series - Report - MDSpire

Minimally invasive, robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors: a case series

  • By

  • Johannes Maria Alberto Toti

  • Ramon Pini

  • Sebastiano Spampatti

  • Lorenzo Bernardi

  • Barbara Kopf

  • Francesco Mongelli

  • Fabio Garofalo

  • Fabiano Iaquinandi

  • Davide La Regina

  • May 20, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection of Tumors

Overview

This case series evaluates the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors. All five patients achieved R0 resection with no complications, suggesting this approach is a viable minimally invasive option.

Background

Surgical management of abdominal wall tumors requires careful consideration of oncological resection and structural integrity. Traditional open surgery is associated with higher postoperative complications and longer recovery times. Robotic-assisted techniques may offer advantages in precision and recovery, warranting further investigation.

Data Highlights

ParameterValue
Number of Patients5
Mean Age56.8 years
Mean BMI21.8 kg/m²
Mean Operative Time144 min
Mean Hospital Stay3.4 days
R0 Resection AchievedYes
ComplicationsNone

Key Findings

  • All patients achieved R0 resection with robotic-assisted techniques.
  • No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported.
  • Four out of five patients underwent mesh-based reconstruction.
  • The mean operative time was 144 minutes.
  • The mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days.
  • No hernia or tumor recurrence was observed during short-term follow-up.

Clinical Implications

Robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors is a safe and effective minimally invasive option. This technique may reduce recovery time and postoperative complications compared to traditional open surgery, making it a valuable addition to surgical practice.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors confined to the musculofascial layer demonstrates promising short-term outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023 -- Minimally Invasive Techniques in Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection, Posterior Vaginectomy, and Sacrectomy: Insights and Case Study
  2. Updates in Surgery, 2020 -- Outcomes of Oncological Significance in Robotic-Assisted Rectal Resection
  3. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024 -- Comparative Analysis of Open Surgery and Robot-Assisted Techniques for Resection of Retroperitoneal Tumors
  4. Updates in Surgery, 2022 -- Robotic Surgery for Submucosal Tumors of the Esophagus: A Case Series from a Single Institution
  5. NCCN Guidelines® Insights, 2025 -- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
  6. Current Management of Desmoid Tumors, 2024 -- A Review
  7. Frontiers, 2026 -- Minimally invasive, robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors: a case series
  8. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2025 - PubMed
  9. Current Management of Desmoid Tumors: A Review | Pediatric Cancer | JAMA Oncology | JAMA Network
  10. Frontiers | Minimally invasive, robotic-assisted resection of abdominal wall tumors: a case series

Original Source(s)

Related Content