The quality evaluation of information in hospice and palliative care short videos on Douyin (TikTok's Chinese version) and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
The quality evaluation of information in hospice and palliative care short videos on Douyin (TikTok's Chinese version) and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study
Assessment of Information Quality in Short Videos on Hospice and Palliative Care
Overview
This study evaluates the quality and reliability of hospice and palliative care (HPC) videos on Douyin and Bilibili.
Background
The increasing use of short video platforms for health information necessitates an assessment of the quality of content, particularly in hospice and palliative care (HPC). Misconceptions about HPC can lead to delayed medical decisions, highlighting the need for reliable information dissemination.
Data Highlights
Platform
GQS Median Score
p-value
Douyin
4.75
< 0.001
Bilibili
4.40
Key Findings
Douyin videos had significantly higher GQS scores than Bilibili (median 4.75 vs. 4.40, p < 0.001).
No significant differences in mDISCERN and JAMA scores between the two platforms.
Healthcare professional-uploaded videos received better quality ratings across all assessment methods.
User engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares) were significantly higher on Douyin.
Likes showed a weak positive correlation with GQS scores (r = 0.376, p < 0.001).
Clinical Implications
Healthcare professional-uploaded videos received better quality ratings across all assessment methods.
Conclusion
The study emphasizes the importance of enhancing content regulation on these platforms.