Comparative outcomes of transcranial craniotomy and endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma: a single-center retrospective cohort study - Report - MDSpire

Comparative outcomes of transcranial craniotomy and endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma: a single-center retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Lei Zhang

  • Ben Li Li

  • Shuo Wei

  • Fa An Miao

  • Hong Fu Chen

  • Yue Chao Fan

  • Pei Zhi Ji

  • Hui Zhang

  • June 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery Versus Transcranial Craniotomy for Craniopharyngioma

Overview

This study compares outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and transcranial craniotomy (TCA) for craniopharyngioma resection.

Background

Craniopharyngiomas are benign tumors that can cause significant morbidity due to their location near critical neurovascular structures. Surgical resection is the primary treatment, but the optimal approach remains debated. Understanding the comparative outcomes of different surgical techniques is crucial for improving patient management.

Data Highlights

OutcomeEEATCAp-value
Gross Total Resection Rate82.4%45.5%0.002
Length of Stay (days)16.19 ± 3.9718.76 ± 4.230.019
Improvement in Symptoms90.9%76.5%0.047
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (logMAR)0.30 [0.12, 0.45]0.42 [0.22, 0.62]0.041
Electrolyte Imbalance17.6%42.4%0.021
Transient Diabetes Insipidus20.6%45.5%0.028
Persistent Diabetes Insipidus14.7%30.3%0.048
New Hypopituitarism41.2%69.7%0.022
Recurrence/Progression Rate8.8%21.2%0.047

Key Findings

  • EEA achieved a higher gross total resection rate (82.4% vs. 45.5%, p=0.002).
  • Patients undergoing EEA had a shorter hospital stay (16.19 ± 3.97 days vs. 18.76 ± 4.23 days, p=0.019).
  • Improvement in headache/ICP-related symptoms was observed in 90.9% of EEA patients compared to 76.5% of TCA patients (p=0.047).
  • Objective visual outcomes were better after EEA (BCVA logMAR 0.30 vs. 0.42, p=0.041).
  • EEA was associated with lower rates of electrolyte imbalance (17.6% vs. 42.4%, p=0.021) and transient diabetes insipidus (20.6% vs. 45.5%, p=0.028).
  • Recurrence/progression rates were lower in EEA patients (8.8% vs. 21.2%, p=0.047).

Clinical Implications

The findings provide comparative outcomes of EEA and TCA for craniopharyngioma.

Conclusion

This study presents outcomes of EEA and TCA in terms of resection rates and complications.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  6. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  7. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  8. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  9. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  10. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  11. 2025 UK Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group Guidelines
  12. French National Consensus on Craniopharyngiomas
  13. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
  14. Hypothalamic Morbidities and Endocrinological Outcomes Following Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
  15. Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics - PMC
  16. Clinical Outcomes of Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Craniopharyngiomas: A Single-Institution Experience - PMC
  17. BRAF–MEK Inhibition in Newly Diagnosed Papillary Craniopharyngiomas - PMC
  18. CTNI-30. ALLIANCE A071601: PHASE II TRIAL OF BRAF/MEK INHIBITION IN RECURRENT PAPILLARY CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS | Neuro-Oncology | Oxford Academic

Original Source(s)

Related Content