Development and validation of multidimensional nomograms for predicting prostate cancer risk: a retrospective study - Report - MDSpire

Development and validation of multidimensional nomograms for predicting prostate cancer risk: a retrospective study

  • By

  • Tao Zhang

  • Xue Li

  • Junsong Zeng

  • Maosen Xu

  • Yan Tie

  • June 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Creation and assessment of comprehensive nomograms for estimating prostate cancer risk

Overview

This study developed two logistic regression models to predict prostate cancer and high-grade disease in men with total PSA levels greater than 10 ng/mL. The models demonstrated improved risk stratification compared to free PSA percentage alone.

Background

Prostate cancer is a prevalent malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men. The limitations of PSA screening, particularly in the 10–20 ng/mL range, necessitate the development of more accurate predictive tools.

Data Highlights

ParameterModel 1 AUCModel 2 AUCHigh-Grade Cancer Prevalence
Validation0.8710.77955.2%

Key Findings

  • Among 461 patients, 54.7% were diagnosed with prostate cancer.
  • High-grade disease was present in 55.2% of malignant cases.
  • Model 1 included age, TyG index, NLR, fPSA%, smoking, hypertension, and lesion location.
  • Model 2 included age, TyG index, LDH, and smoking history.
  • Model 1 achieved a sensitivity of 80.3% and specificity of 74.6%.
  • Both models provided higher net benefits than fPSA% alone.

Clinical Implications

The developed nomograms may assist in risk stratification for prostate cancer and high-grade disease in patients with elevated PSA levels.

Conclusion

The integration of clinical and laboratory variables into nomograms enhances prostate cancer risk assessment.

Related Resources & Content

  1. European Radiology, 2023 -- A Dual-Phase Nomogram: A Non-Invasive Resource to Aid Breast Radiologists in Clinical Decision-Making
  2. BMC Psychiatry (Springer), 2026 -- Assessing Suicide Risk Among Prostate Cancer Patients: Trends in Epidemiology and Predictive Modeling Techniques
  3. Tailoring Prostate Cancer Diagnosis through Multivariate Risk Assessment: The Role of MRI in Clinical Practice, 2019
  4. Creation of a nomogram for predicting metastatic prostate cancer and evaluation of NCCN, AUA, and EAU guidelines for bone imaging in affected patients, 2020
  5. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer - DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION, 2026
  6. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer - DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
  7. Updates to Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline (2026)
  8. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-HERC/MembersOnly/7.8f%20NCCN%202.2026%20prostate.pdf
  9. Clinical impact of MRI-based risk calculators for prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
  10. NPV of Biparametric and Multiparametric Prostate MRI: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
  11. Prostate Imaging Standards for Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PRISM): International Consensus Recommendations
  12. Frontiers | Development and validation of a clinical nomogram based on lasso-logistic regression for predicting prostate cancer with PSA 4-20.0 ng/mL: a retrospective study
  13. Can the systemic immune-inflammation index be used to differentiate benign and malignant pathologies before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy? | BMC Urology | Springer Nature Link

Original Source(s)

Related Content