Clinical effectiveness of a multidisciplinary thrombosis service versus usual care in the management of venous thromboembolism: A retrospective cohort study - Report - MDSpire

Clinical effectiveness of a multidisciplinary thrombosis service versus usual care in the management of venous thromboembolism: A retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Kwadwo O Bonsu

  • Rufaro S Chitsike

  • Tiffany A Lee

  • Hai V Nguyen

  • Cindy Whitten

  • Stephanie W Young

  • June 10, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Comparative Analysis of a Multidisciplinary Thrombosis Program and Standard Care

Overview

This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness of a multidisciplinary thrombosis program (TS) compared to standard care (UC) for managing acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). The findings suggest that the TS may lead to improved patient outcomes, including reduced recurrence and better management of anticoagulation therapy.

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a critical health issue, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Effective management is essential to prevent complications such as recurrence and bleeding. Multidisciplinary thrombosis programs have been proposed to standardize care and improve outcomes, yet their real-world effectiveness requires further evaluation.

Data Highlights

No numerical data provided in the article.

Key Findings

  • The multidisciplinary thrombosis program (TS) was established to enhance care continuity for VTE patients.
  • High patient satisfaction (85%) and adherence to anticoagulation therapy (88%) were reported in the first two years of the TS.
  • The study compared clinical outcomes of patients managed in the TS versus those receiving standard care (UC).
  • Evidence suggests that structured, team-based approaches can improve clinical outcomes in VTE management.
  • Standardized protocols and pharmacist involvement in the TS aimed to reduce practice variability and improve safety.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare providers should consider implementing multidisciplinary thrombosis programs to improve the management of VTE. Such programs may enhance patient outcomes through standardized care processes and better coordination among healthcare professionals.

Conclusion

The evaluation of the multidisciplinary thrombosis program indicates potential benefits in managing acute VTE, warranting further investigation into its impact on clinical outcomes.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2026 -- Detected residual venous thrombi and catheter-directed management of intermediate-risk pulmonary thromboembolism
  2. Drugs - Real World Outcomes, 2025 -- Efficacy and Safety of Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis
  3. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2026 -- Optimizing catheter-directed thrombolysis access and predicting post-thrombotic syndrome in acute entire-limb DVT: a retrospective cohort study and nomogram development
  4. JAMA Network Open -- Right-Sizing Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients
  5. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines | JACC
  6. Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism | New England Journal of Medicine
  7. Do Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Improve Outcomes? Insights from a Meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
  8. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines | JACC
  9. Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism | New England Journal of Medicine
  10. Do Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Improve Outcomes? Insights from a Meta-analysis - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content