Needs and Perspectives on Upper Limb Prostheses Among Children and Adolescents With Upper Limb Differences - Report - MDSpire

Needs and Perspectives on Upper Limb Prostheses Among Children and Adolescents With Upper Limb Differences

  • By

  • Kevin Wendo

  • Crystal Chigbu

  • Obafemi Ekundayo

  • Oluwaseun Ayodeji

  • Fiyinfoluwa Ayoola

  • Adebowale Adekemisola Ayoola

  • Gbolamide Ogunkua

  • Vindication Joseph

  • Gift Anyanwu

  • Séverine Guisset

  • Jade Ward

  • Benoît Herman

  • Stéphane Moniotte

  • Raphael Olszewski

  • June 25, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Perspectives and Requirements for Upper Limb Prosthetics in Children and Adolescents

Overview

This study investigates the needs and perceptions of children and adolescents with upper limb differences (ULDs) in Nigeria regarding upper limb prosthetics (ULPs).

Background

Upper limb differences (ULDs) can lead to significant physical and psychosocial challenges during childhood. Many children with ULDs do not utilize prosthetics due to a lack of perceived need or functionality, as indicated by existing literature. Understanding the perspectives of these children is crucial for developing effective prosthetic solutions, especially in low- and middle-income countries where access to services is limited.

Data Highlights

No numerical data was provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • Children with congenital below-elbow differences often reject prostheses due to retained near-typical function.
  • Prosthetic solutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are often based on data from high-income countries (HICs), limiting their applicability.
  • Qualitative research is needed to explore the lived experiences of children with ULDs in LMICs.
  • Key factors influencing ULP use include functionality, affordability, and durability.
  • Most children with ULDs reside in LMICs, where access to prosthetic services is limited.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare providers should consider the unique needs and preferences of children with ULDs when designing prosthetic solutions.

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the necessity of understanding the perspectives of children with ULDs.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frequency and Management of Secondary Deformities Following Megaendoprosthetic Replacement of the Proximal Femur in Pediatric Bone Sarcoma Patients, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024 -- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05334-1
  2. Anatomical Feasibility Study of Autologous Radial Head Replacement: Comparing Proximal Fibula and Second Metatarsal Base Options, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022 -- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-022-04460-y
  3. Evaluation of Blade Plate Retention Versus Removal on Bone Remodelling in Children After Proximal Femoral Osteotomy, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2025 -- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06058-6
  4. The Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin Classification of Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies: A Consensus Decision-Making Study for Difficult or Unclassifiable Cases, PubMed, 2023 -- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36089550/?utm_source=openai
  5. ISO 8548-3:2025 - Residual Limb Description After Upper Limb, Standards, 2025 -- https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/iso/dbcf9f3b-9602-4e4e-88c6-fc2c41cff0b4/iso-8548-3-2025?utm_source=openai
  6. ICHOM | Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies Standard Set, ICHOM, 2023 -- https://www.ichom.org/patient-centered-outcome-measure/congenital-upper-limb-anomalies/?utm_source=openai
  7. Frequency and Management of Secondary Deformities Following Megaendoprosthetic Replacement of the Proximal Femur in Pediatric Bone Sarcoma Patients
  8. Anatomical Feasibility Study of Autologous Radial Head Replacement: Comparing Proximal Fibula and Second Metatarsal Base Options
  9. Evaluation of Blade Plate Retention Versus Removal on Bone Remodelling in Children After Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
  10. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery — Dynamic radiographic angle changes in planovalgus foot correction among children with cerebral palsy
  11. Functional outcome measures for pediatric upper limb deficiencies with and without prostheses: A systematic review and appraisal
  12. Options for Limb Prostheses - Special Subjects - MSD Manual Professional Edition
  13. The Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin Classification of Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies: A Consensus Decision-Making Study for Difficult or Unclassifiable Cases
  14. ISO 8548-3:2025 - Residual Limb Description After Upper Limb
  15. ICHOM | Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies Standard Set
  16. Establishing and Maintaining Congenital Upper Limb Difference Registries: Insights From Global Experiences - PubMed
  17. Congenital upper limb difference patient registries: characteristics, comparisons and recommendations - PMC
  18. Study Details | NCT05579002 | Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of Hero Arm Prosthesis in Children After One Year of Use. | ClinicalTrials.gov
  19. Achievement of Expectations and Functional Impact of the Hero Arm Bionic Hand Prosthesis in Children with Congenital Below-Elbow Deficiency: A Retrospective, Cross-sectional Study | Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics | DeepDyve
  20. Expanding Insurance Coverage for Pediatric Upper Extremity Recreational Prosthetic Devices - PMC
  21. Assessing the Mobility of a Prosthetic Hand Featuring Soft Silicone Joints for War-Wounded Children: A Case Study - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content