Correction: Clinical significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based stratification in a large retrospective SLE cohort - Report - MDSpire

Correction: Clinical significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based stratification in a large retrospective SLE cohort

  • By

  • Fan Wang

  • Yang Xu

  • Wei Zhang

  • Wenyou Pan

  • Lin Liu

  • Min Wu

  • Fuwan Ding

  • Huaixia Hu

  • Xiang Ding

  • Hua Wei

  • Yaohong Zou

  • Wei Kong

  • Yun Zhu

  • Xuebing Feng

  • Lingyun Sun

  • May 22, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Correction on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in SLE

Overview

This report addresses a correction regarding the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in a large retrospective cohort. The findings emphasize the importance of accurate institutional affiliations and the clinical relevance of ESR in managing SLE.

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with varied clinical manifestations, making early diagnosis challenging. Accurate classification and stratification of SLE are crucial for effective management and treatment strategies. The use of laboratory markers such as ESR can provide valuable insights into disease activity and inform clinical decisions.

Data Highlights

No numerical or trial data is presented in the correction article.

Key Findings

  • The correction clarifies the institutional affiliation of the authors involved in the study.
  • ESR-based classification can aid in tracking disease activity in SLE patients.
  • Combining ESR with CRP can enhance the identification of coexisting infections during SLE flares.
  • Current guidelines support the use of ESR as a low-cost adjunct in clinical practice.
  • Accurate interpretation of ESR alongside other markers is essential for differentiating between lupus activity and infections.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should ensure accurate institutional affiliations in published research to maintain credibility. Additionally, incorporating ESR and CRP into routine assessments can improve the management of SLE, particularly in distinguishing disease activity from infections.

Conclusion

The correction highlights the significance of accurate author affiliations and reinforces the role of ESR in the clinical management of SLE. Continued emphasis on laboratory markers will enhance patient care and treatment outcomes.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Wang F, Xu Y, Zhang W, et al., Frontiers in Immunology, 2026 -- Correction: Importance of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate-Based Classification in a Large Retrospective Cohort of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  2. Clinical Rheumatology, 2024 -- Evaluation of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) in the Cohort of the Egyptian College of Rheumatology Study
  3. Clinical Rheumatology, 2024 -- Evaluation of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) in a Colombian Patient Cohort
  4. Clinical Rheumatology, 2021 -- Factors Influencing and Protective Elements of Achieving Low Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Insights from a Prospective Study in a Chinese Population
  5. Clinical Rheumatology — Urinary Changes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus May Not Always Signal Lupus Nephritis: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Cohort Analysis
  6. 2025 ACR Guidelines for SLE Management
  7. Frontiers | Clinical significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based stratification in a large retrospective SLE cohort
  8. Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis | Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology | Springer Nature Link

Original Source(s)

Related Content