Repair lower extremity vascular injury using a parallel connection for reconstruction of vessel graft with autogenous vein - Report - MDSpire

Repair lower extremity vascular injury using a parallel connection for reconstruction of vessel graft with autogenous vein

  • By

  • Jian-ping Liu

  • Qian Yao

  • Zhi-biao Le

  • Jun-qi Xiao

  • Rong Ye

  • Qing Duan

  • Jie Peng

  • Xunhong Duan

  • June 26, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Vascular Injuries Utilizing Autologous Vein Grafts with a Parallel Connection Technique

Overview

This study evaluates the parallel connection method for reconstructing lower extremity vascular injuries using autologous vein grafts. Results indicate lower thrombosis and amputation rates compared to direct autogenous vein grafting, although with longer operative times.

Background

Lower extremity vascular injuries are critical conditions that can lead to severe complications, including limb amputation. Autologous venous grafting is the standard approach for vascular reconstruction, yet challenges arise when the caliber of the donor vein does not match the recipient vessel. The parallel connection technique aims to address these challenges and improve surgical outcomes.

Data Highlights

GroupThrombosis RateAmputation RateProcedure Time
Parallel Connection5.88%0%Longer
Direct Autogenous Vein Graft53.85%38.46%Shorter

Key Findings

  • The parallel connection method resulted in a thrombosis rate of 5.88% compared to 53.85% for direct autogenous vein grafting (P < 0.05).
  • Amputation rates were 0% in the parallel connection group versus 38.46% in the direct graft group (P < 0.05).
  • For venous reconstruction, the thrombosis rate was 7.69% in the parallel connection group compared to 57.14% in the direct group (P < 0.05).
  • The procedure time was significantly longer for the parallel connection method (P < 0.05).
  • No pseudoaneurysm, stenosis, or thromboembolism was observed in the target vessels during follow-up (23–60 months).

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider the longer operative time associated with the parallel connection method.

Conclusion

The parallel connection method demonstrates differences in outcomes in vascular injury reconstruction compared to direct autogenous vein grafting.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Utilization of the Femoral Vein for Long-Term Aorto-Iliac Reconstruction in Cases of Aortic Infection and Aortitis, 2022 -- Springer
  2. Application of a posterior tibial artery perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap with a broad fascial pedicle in reconstruction of complex lower-leg wounds, 2026 -- Frontiers in Surgery
  3. Utilization of Disposable IV Infusion Sets as Temporary Vascular Shunts in Major Limb Replantation: A Retrospective Analysis, 2024 -- Springer
  4. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma -- ScienceDirect
  5. Utilization of Left Renal Vein Graft and In Situ Hepatic Perfusion During Hepatectomy for Tumors Invading Hepatic Veins: Enhancing Hemodynamics and Surgical Approach
  6. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma - ScienceDirect
  7. TIVS versus Non-TIVS management of limb vascular injury in limb salvage: systematic review and meta-analysis | Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Springer Nature Link
  8. Frontiers | Repair lower extremity vascular injury using a parallel connection for reconstruction vessel graft with autogenous vein

Original Source(s)

Related Content