ESR Essentials: artificial intelligence in breast imaging—practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging - Scorecard - MDSpire

ESR Essentials: artificial intelligence in breast imaging—practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging

  • By

  • Simone Schiaffino

  • Daniela Bernardi

  • Nuala Healy

  • Maria Adele Marino

  • Valeria Romeo

  • Ioannis Sechopoulos

  • Ritse M. Mann

  • Katja Pinker

  • August 26, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Key Insights on AI Utilization in Breast Imaging: Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBreast cancer detection and imaging
Key MechanismsAI enhances lesion detection, specificity, and workflow efficiency in breast imaging modalities including mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI
Target PopulationWomen undergoing breast cancer screening and diagnostic breast imaging
Care SettingBreast imaging centers and population-based screening programs

Key Highlights

  • AI systems improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in mammography screening with moderate evidence supporting their use.
  • Commercial AI tools for digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound aid lesion classification and reduce interpretation time, though clinical impact requires further evaluation.
  • Robust governance and continuous post-market surveillance are essential for safe and effective AI implementation in breast imaging.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use AI as an aid to radiologists in breast imaging interpretation without replacing clinical judgment.
  • Accept or overrule AI findings based on comprehensive clinical information without mandatory explanation in reports.

Management

  • Implement AI tools following robust evidence and WHO phased evaluation, emphasizing post-market surveillance (phase 4).
  • Consider AI integration in screening workflows to reduce radiologist workload and improve cancer detection rates.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Conduct rigorous post-market surveillance of AI performance to ensure safety, quality, and efficiency.
  • Monitor AI impact on long-term clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and workflow changes.

Risks

  • Potential variability in AI performance across different imaging modalities and populations.
  • Lack of evidence for improved long-term clinical outcomes necessitates cautious adoption.
  • Risk of overreliance on AI without sufficient radiologist oversight.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Women undergoing breast cancer screening and diagnostic imaging

AI-assisted mammography screening can increase cancer detection rates by 5–13% with minimal increase in recall rates; AI reduces radiologist workload significantly while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Integrate AI as a supportive tool rather than a standalone diagnostic method.
  • Ensure AI tools undergo large-scale validation and reach WHO phase 4 with continuous performance monitoring before strong clinical recommendations.
  • Use decision-referral models to triage cases, optimizing radiologist workload and diagnostic accuracy.
  • Maintain radiologist authority to accept or overrule AI findings based on full clinical context.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content