The Infectious Diseases Orchestrator: Embracing AI Literacy in the Agentic Era
-
By
-
John J Hanna
-
Richard J Medford
-
December 26, 2025
Clinical Scorecard: Harnessing AI Literacy in Infectious Disease Management: Navigating the Agentic Era
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Infectious diseases requiring complex, data-intensive clinical decision-making |
| Key Mechanisms | Agentic AI systems that perceive, reason, and act within clinical environments to augment infectious disease practice |
| Target Population | Infectious disease clinicians and patients affected by infectious diseases |
| Care Setting | Diverse healthcare settings including tertiary health systems, rural hospitals, resource-constrained clinics, and low- and middle-income countries |
Key Highlights
- Agentic AI advances enable real-time synthesis of epidemiology, microbiology, resistance patterns, and clinical risk factors to support ID decisions.
- AI literacy is essential for ID clinicians to actively guide AI tool use, ensuring appropriate automation boundaries, equity, and safety.
- AI-powered workflows can reduce clinician burden by automating repetitive tasks and democratize access to ID expertise across varied care settings.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Incorporate AI tools such as antimicrobial resistance algorithms and sepsis predictive models to enhance diagnostic accuracy.
- Use AI systems that integrate structured and unstructured data including clinical notes and microbiology reports.
Management
- Adopt agentic AI workflows to augment antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programs.
- Ensure human oversight in critical decisions to mitigate risks of AI errors and biases.
- Advocate for high-quality data inputs and continuous validation of AI tools in clinical practice.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Monitor AI tool performance for false positives, generalizability, and equity across diverse patient populations.
- Establish governance policies and interdisciplinary collaboration to oversee AI integration and impact.
Risks
- Be aware of alert fatigue caused by high false positive rates in AI alerts.
- Recognize potential documentation inaccuracies from AI-generated text errors.
- Address algorithmic biases that may perpetuate healthcare inequities if AI tools are used uncritically.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with infectious diseases receiving AI-augmented clinical care
AI tools support antimicrobial prescribing by enforcing guidelines and providing decision support but require clinician oversight to avoid errors and biases.
Clinical Best Practices
- Develop foundational AI literacy among ID clinicians to interpret, validate, and optimize AI tool use.
- Set clear boundaries on automation to maintain human control over critical clinical decisions.
- Promote interdisciplinary education and governance frameworks for responsible AI deployment in infectious disease practice.
- Leverage AI to automate repetitive, searchable tasks to reduce clinician burnout and improve workflow efficiency.
- Utilize AI-enabled hub-and-spoke and mobile-first models to expand access to ID expertise in underserved settings.
References
- Agentic AI systems in clinical environments
- Antimicrobial resistance deterministic algorithms
- Sepsis predictive models
- AI challenges in healthcare including alert fatigue and biases
- Large Language Models and natural language processing in healthcare
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.