A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of a school-based intervention for promoting health and well-being in low-resource settings: the ISOBAR study protocol - Scorecard - MDSpire

A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of a school-based intervention for promoting health and well-being in low-resource settings: the ISOBAR study protocol

  • By

  • Swaran P. Singh

  • Catherine Winsper

  • Nadia Binte Alam

  • Tolulope Bella-Awusah

  • Graeme Currie

  • Oluwabunmi (Tokun) Fola-Bolumole

  • Domenico Giacco

  • Paramjit Gill

  • Sanjana Goutham

  • Srividya N. Iyer

  • Jasmine Kalha

  • Isha Lohumi

  • Jason Madan

  • Dafne Moroni

  • Olayinka Omigbodun

  • Soumitra Pathare

  • Shiva Prakash Srinivasan

  • Simon Smith

  • J.S. Thakur

  • Thara Rangaswamy

  • Helena Tuomainen

  • Samuel Watson

  • Sagar Jilka

  • July 14, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Hybrid Study Protocol for Assessing the Effectiveness of a School-Based Health Promotion Intervention in Resource-Limited Environments: The ISOBAR Project

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) in adolescents
Key MechanismsSchool-based health promotion interventions addressing mental and physical health
Target PopulationAdolescents aged 12-18 years in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs)
Care SettingSchool environments in resource-limited settings

Key Highlights

  • Development of a culturally adapted three-stage composite intervention for physical and mental health
  • Focus on co-production to ensure intervention suitability to local settings
  • Research capacity building for future studies in implementation science and health economics
  • Logistical and ethical constraints prevent randomized controlled trial design
  • Control condition students receive guidance to local services, potentially affecting intervention outcomes

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assessment for mental health/behavioral problems and nutritional/weight problems at baseline

Management

  • Implementation of a universal health literacy intervention and indicated counselling for at-risk adolescents

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Conducting assessments on intervention effectiveness, implementation processes, and cost-effectiveness

Risks

  • Causal inference limitations due to the absence of a randomized controlled trial design

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adolescents in LMICs, specifically in Chennai, Gujarat (India), and Ibadan (Nigeria)

Intervention includes health literacy and counselling based on pre-determined health thresholds

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize multi-component interventions to address complex health issues
  • Adapt interventions culturally to fit local contexts and needs
  • Engage local teams in the recruitment and implementation processes

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content