Comparing Telehealth and In-Person Interventions for Childhood and Adolescent Obesity: Results from a Randomized Controlled Study
-
By
-
Lior Friedman
-
Tzach Itzhak Gil
-
Amit Yaniv
-
Eylam Ziv-Av
-
Alon Manhart
-
Yftach Gepner
-
Gal Dubnov-Raz
-
July 1, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Comparing Telehealth and In-Person Interventions for Childhood and Adolescent Obesity: Results from a Randomized Controlled Study
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|
| Condition | Childhood and Adolescent Obesity |
| Key Mechanisms | High-intensity, multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions delivered via telehealth vs. face-to-face care. |
| Target Population | Children and adolescents aged 10–18 years with obesity. |
| Care Setting | Tertiary paediatric lifestyle and obesity clinic. |
Key Highlights
- Paediatric obesity is a significant public health challenge with increasing prevalence.
- Existing treatment programs often yield modest reductions in BMI.
- Telehealth interventions can reduce logistical barriers and improve accessibility.
- The study compares a TELE-based program with standard face-to-face care.
- High-intensity interventions are necessary for meaningful weight outcomes.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Obesity defined as BMI at or above 2 standard deviations according to WHO growth reference.
Management
- Comprehensive lifestyle-based interventions are recommended.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Safety and adverse events should be monitored throughout the intervention.
Risks
- Exclusion criteria limited to significant physical or cognitive barriers to participation.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Children and adolescents aged 10–18 years with obesity.
Participants required ownership of a smartphone compatible with the intervention platform.
Clinical Best Practices
- Utilize multidisciplinary approaches prioritizing overall well-being.
- Integrate personalized nutritional, medical, and physical activity guidance.
Related Resources & Content
