Listening in: Orthopaedic Oncology Physicians' Perspectives on Implementation of Audio Recording/Artificial Intelligence Assist in Office Visits - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Insights from Orthopaedic Oncology Specialists on the Use of Audio Recording and AI Support During Patient Consultations

  • By

  • Megan Hsu

  • Annemarie K. Leonard

  • Sean McGarry

  • Tessa Balach

  • June 1, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Insights from Orthopaedic Oncology Specialists on the Use of Audio Recording and AI Support During Patient Consultations

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionOrthopaedic Oncology
Key MechanismsUse of AI ambient listening software for clinical documentation
Target PopulationOrthopaedic oncologists
Care SettingAcademic and clinical settings

Key Highlights

  • 94% of respondents practiced in an academic setting
  • 27% reported using AI ambient listening software
  • 86% of AI users reported improved efficiency and accuracy in documentation
  • 71% of non-users were considering implementation of AI tools
  • Key barriers to implementation included cost and hospital availability

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

      Monitoring & Follow-up

        Risks

        • Concerns about patient data safety
        • Potential alteration of the patient-physician relationship
        • Accuracy of AI software

        Patient & Prescribing Data

        Patients seen by orthopaedic oncologists

        AI users noted a positive impact on clinical encounters

        Clinical Best Practices

        • Consider AI tools to reduce documentation burden
        • Evaluate the impact of AI on physician-patient interactions
        • Assess training needs for effective AI implementation

        Related Resources & Content

        Original Source(s)

        Related Content