ESR Essentials: imaging of lymphoma—practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging - Scorecard - MDSpire

ESR Essentials: imaging of lymphoma—practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging

  • By

  • Doris Leithner

  • Emanuele Neri

  • Melvin D’Anastasi

  • Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

  • Michael Winkelmann

  • Wolfgang G. Kunz

  • Clemens C. Cyran

  • Dania Cioni

  • Evis Sala

  • Marius E. Mayerhoefer

  • January 2, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Key Imaging Guidelines for Lymphoma: Recommendations from the European Society of Oncologic Imaging

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionLymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin subtypes)
Key MechanismsImaging modalities assess lesion size, morphology, and metabolic activity using [18F]FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT
Target PopulationPatients with Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive and indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including subtypes such as DLBCL, follicular lymphoma, SLL/CLL, marginal zone lymphoma
Care SettingOncologic imaging in hospital or specialized cancer centers with access to PET/CT or CT

Key Highlights

  • [18F]FDG-PET/CT is preferred for staging and treatment response in most lymphomas due to high FDG avidity
  • CT is used for staging and response assessment in non-FDG-avid lymphomas such as SLL/CLL and some indolent NHL
  • The 5-point Deauville score on PET is recommended for treatment response assessment in FDG-avid lymphomas

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use [18F]FDG-PET/CT for staging Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive or FDG-avid indolent NHL
  • Use contrast-enhanced CT for staging non-FDG-avid lymphomas like SLL/CLL
  • Perform biopsies to rule out bone marrow involvement in all lymphoma subtypes except Hodgkin lymphoma

Management

  • Apply the Ann Arbor or Lugano staging systems based on imaging findings
  • Use PET/CT for early detection of treatment response in FDG-avid lymphomas
  • Use CT to assess lesion size changes in non-FDG-avid lymphomas
  • Consider PET/CT if Richter transformation is suspected in SLL/CLL, with SUVmax > 5 indicating suspicion

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use the 5-point Deauville score to compare FDG uptake in lymphoma lesions versus reference tissues on PET for response assessment
  • Use CT to monitor lesion size changes in non-FDG-avid lymphomas
  • MRI may be used for CNS lymphoma and as a problem-solving tool for equivocal bone marrow lesions

Risks

  • Potential misinterpretation if PET/CT is not used in FDG-avid lymphomas
  • Limited sensitivity of CT alone in detecting metabolic changes in lymphoma
  • Access and availability issues for PET/CT may lead to reliance on CT in some settings

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with various lymphoma subtypes including Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive and indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Imaging guides staging, treatment response assessment, and biopsy decisions; PET/CT detects metabolic response earlier than CT, influencing treatment adjustments

Clinical Best Practices

  • Select imaging modality based on lymphoma subtype FDG avidity: PET/CT for FDG-avid, CT for non-FDG-avid
  • Perform PET and contrast-enhanced CT on the same scanner when possible, using non-contrast CT for PET attenuation correction
  • Avoid terms 'primary' and 'metastasis' in lymphoma reporting; use 'nodal' and 'extranodal manifestations' instead
  • Consider MRI for CNS lymphoma and equivocal bone marrow lesions; whole-body MRI may be used in vulnerable populations
  • Use a long-axis diameter > 1.5 cm to define suspicious lymph nodes
  • Apply the Ann Arbor or Lugano staging systems consistently for lymphoma staging

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content