Clinical Scorecard: Key Imaging Guidelines for Lymphoma: Recommendations from the European Society of Oncologic Imaging
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin subtypes)
Key Mechanisms
Imaging modalities assess lesion size, morphology, and metabolic activity using [18F]FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT
Target Population
Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive and indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including subtypes such as DLBCL, follicular lymphoma, SLL/CLL, marginal zone lymphoma
Care Setting
Oncologic imaging in hospital or specialized cancer centers with access to PET/CT or CT
Key Highlights
[18F]FDG-PET/CT is preferred for staging and treatment response in most lymphomas due to high FDG avidity
CT is used for staging and response assessment in non-FDG-avid lymphomas such as SLL/CLL and some indolent NHL
The 5-point Deauville score on PET is recommended for treatment response assessment in FDG-avid lymphomas
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use [18F]FDG-PET/CT for staging Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive or FDG-avid indolent NHL
Use contrast-enhanced CT for staging non-FDG-avid lymphomas like SLL/CLL
Perform biopsies to rule out bone marrow involvement in all lymphoma subtypes except Hodgkin lymphoma
Management
Apply the Ann Arbor or Lugano staging systems based on imaging findings
Use PET/CT for early detection of treatment response in FDG-avid lymphomas
Use CT to assess lesion size changes in non-FDG-avid lymphomas
Consider PET/CT if Richter transformation is suspected in SLL/CLL, with SUVmax > 5 indicating suspicion
Monitoring & Follow-up
Use the 5-point Deauville score to compare FDG uptake in lymphoma lesions versus reference tissues on PET for response assessment
Use CT to monitor lesion size changes in non-FDG-avid lymphomas
MRI may be used for CNS lymphoma and as a problem-solving tool for equivocal bone marrow lesions
Risks
Potential misinterpretation if PET/CT is not used in FDG-avid lymphomas
Limited sensitivity of CT alone in detecting metabolic changes in lymphoma
Access and availability issues for PET/CT may lead to reliance on CT in some settings
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with various lymphoma subtypes including Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive and indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Imaging guides staging, treatment response assessment, and biopsy decisions; PET/CT detects metabolic response earlier than CT, influencing treatment adjustments
Clinical Best Practices
Select imaging modality based on lymphoma subtype FDG avidity: PET/CT for FDG-avid, CT for non-FDG-avid
Perform PET and contrast-enhanced CT on the same scanner when possible, using non-contrast CT for PET attenuation correction
Avoid terms 'primary' and 'metastasis' in lymphoma reporting; use 'nodal' and 'extranodal manifestations' instead
Consider MRI for CNS lymphoma and equivocal bone marrow lesions; whole-body MRI may be used in vulnerable populations
Use a long-axis diameter > 1.5 cm to define suspicious lymph nodes
Apply the Ann Arbor or Lugano staging systems consistently for lymphoma staging
by Doris Leithner, Emanuele Neri, Melvin D’Anastasi, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Michael Winkelmann, Wolfgang G. Kunz, Clemens C. Cyran, Dania Cioni, Evis Sala, Marius E. Mayerhoefer