Oropharyngeal swabs show higher bacterial loads than nasopharyngeal swabs for PCR detection of pertussis: a multicenter prospective study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparison of Bacterial Loads in Oropharyngeal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for PCR-Based Detection of Pertussis: Findings from a Multicenter Prospective Study

  • By

  • Kentaro Wakamatsu

  • Yoshifumi Tananari

  • Kimiko Nakamura

  • Teru Nakamura

  • Ryoichi Yamakawa

  • Toshinobu Matsuura

  • Kyoko Yamakawa

  • Kuniko Tananari

  • Mitsuru Iseda

  • Chikage Tokunaga

  • Chiyoko Bando

  • Zenzo Nagasawa

  • Kouta Katsuki

  • Sae Kawamoto

  • Ruriko Kiyotani

  • Izumi Fukui

  • Satomi Asai

  • Nobuhiko Nagata

  • Hozumi Yamada

  • July 17, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Comparison of Bacterial Loads in Oropharyngeal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for PCR-Based Detection of Pertussis: Findings from a Multicenter Prospective Study

At a Glance

Category

Detail

Condition

Pertussis

Key Mechanisms

Respiratory infection caused by Bordetella pertussis

Target Population

Patients presenting with cough; PCR positivity was highest among adolescents

Care Setting

Outpatient clinics and emergency departments at five institutions in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan

Key Highlights

  • Real-time PCR was used to detect B pertussis in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs.

  • Oropharyngeal swabs are less invasive and easier to collect than nasopharyngeal swabs.

  • Of 475 patients, 113 (23.8%) were PCR-positive for B pertussis.

  • Pertussis vaccination was reported in 95.4% of participants; PCR positivity did not differ significantly by vaccination status.

  • Median age was 13.0 years, and PCR positivity was highest among adolescents, particularly those aged 13 to 15 years.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

The study did not issue clinical guidelines; the points below reflect its methods, findings, and conclusions.

Diagnosis

  • Consider oropharyngeal swabs as a practical alternative for PCR-based pertussis detection.

  • Consider PCR early after symptom onset and serology during later stages.

Management

  • The study did not evaluate treatment responses or establish management recommendations.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Diagnostic strategies should account for specimen type, patient age, and time from symptom onset.

Risks

  • Waning vaccine-induced immunity may contribute to the increased detection of pertussis among adolescents.

  • The macrolide resistance-associated A2047G mutation was detected in 65 of 73 analyzed PCR-positive cases (89.0%), supporting continued surveillance.

Patient & Prescribing Data

The study enrolled 475 patients with cough presenting to outpatient clinics or emergency departments.

Macrolide resistance-associated mutations were evaluated, but clinical outcomes and treatment responses were not assessed.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use trained health care professionals and standardized procedures to collect specimens.

  • Consider the interval between symptom onset and specimen collection when selecting diagnostic tests.

  • Interpret PCR and serology as complementary tests with different temporal patterns.

Related Resources & Content

  • Oropharyngeal Swabs Show Higher Bacterial Loads Than Nasopharyngeal Swabs for PCR Detection of Pertussis: A Multicenter Prospective Study

  • Supplementary materials accompanying the study

  • National guideline for pathogen detection of pertussis, fourth edition, revised March 2024

  • Novel Multitarget Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Bordetella Species in Clinical Specimens

  • Waning Protection After Acellular Pertussis Vaccination

Original Source(s)

Related Content