Comparative analysis of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparative analysis of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction

  • By

  • Salih Bürlukkara

  • Afife Ayla Kabalak

  • Alpay Ateş

  • Özer Baran

  • Aykut Aykaç

  • Hakkı Uğur Özok

  • April 26, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Patient and Surgical Staff Satisfaction with Combined Spinal–Epidural versus General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionKidney stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Key MechanismsComparison of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia (CSEA) versus general anesthesia effects on patient and surgical staff satisfaction, analgesic requirements, and surgical outcomes
Target PopulationPatients undergoing PCNL for stones larger than 20 mm without severe comorbidities (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, severe pulmonary disease)
Care SettingOperating room during percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery

Key Highlights

  • PCNL is the primary treatment for large kidney stones (>20 mm) allowing minimal kidney damage and effective stone removal.
  • General anesthesia offers advantages in hemodynamic and airway control and higher satisfaction in upper pole puncture cases.
  • CSEA reduces complication risks, supports minimally invasive surgery, and may improve early recovery and discharge.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use PCNL as primary treatment for stones larger than 20 mm according to European Urological Association guidelines.

Management

  • Select anesthesia type (general anesthesia or CSEA) based on patient medical history, surgical requirements, and team expertise.
  • General anesthesia involves intravenous induction and maintenance with desflurane and controlled ventilation.
  • CSEA involves lumbar spinal injection of bupivacaine with epidural catheter placement for analgesia.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation continuously during surgery.
  • Evaluate postoperative pain using visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 hours post-CSEA.
  • Assess satisfaction scores of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and operating room personnel immediately after surgery.

Risks

  • Exclude patients with uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, severe pulmonary disease, liver failure, coagulation disorders, cerebrovascular disease, or refusal of CSEA.
  • Consider potential hemodynamic instability and airway management challenges with general anesthesia.
  • Consider reduced complication risk and improved safety profile with CSEA.

Patient & Prescribing Data

44 patients undergoing PCNL, divided into general anesthesia and CSEA groups

CSEA may reduce postoperative analgesic requirements and support early mobilization; general anesthesia preferred for better airway and hemodynamic control especially in upper pole puncture cases.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Preoperative assessment should exclude patients with significant comorbidities contraindicating CSEA.
  • Use standardized satisfaction scoring (0–10 scale) for surgical team and anesthesia personnel to evaluate anesthesia effectiveness.
  • Ensure adequate preoperative hydration and sedation prior to CSEA.
  • Tailor anesthesia choice to patient condition, surgical complexity, and team expertise to optimize outcomes.
  • Monitor postoperative pain with VAS and adjust analgesia accordingly.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content