Comparative analysis of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Comparative analysis of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction
Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Patient and Surgical Staff Satisfaction with Combined Spinal–Epidural versus General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Study
Comparison of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia (CSEA) versus general anesthesia effects on patient and surgical staff satisfaction, analgesic requirements, and surgical outcomes
Target Population
Patients undergoing PCNL for stones larger than 20 mm without severe comorbidities (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, severe pulmonary disease)
Care Setting
Operating room during percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery
Key Highlights
PCNL is the primary treatment for large kidney stones (>20 mm) allowing minimal kidney damage and effective stone removal.
General anesthesia offers advantages in hemodynamic and airway control and higher satisfaction in upper pole puncture cases.
CSEA reduces complication risks, supports minimally invasive surgery, and may improve early recovery and discharge.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use PCNL as primary treatment for stones larger than 20 mm according to European Urological Association guidelines.
Management
Select anesthesia type (general anesthesia or CSEA) based on patient medical history, surgical requirements, and team expertise.
General anesthesia involves intravenous induction and maintenance with desflurane and controlled ventilation.
CSEA involves lumbar spinal injection of bupivacaine with epidural catheter placement for analgesia.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Monitor heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation continuously during surgery.
Evaluate postoperative pain using visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 hours post-CSEA.
Assess satisfaction scores of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and operating room personnel immediately after surgery.
Risks
Exclude patients with uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, severe pulmonary disease, liver failure, coagulation disorders, cerebrovascular disease, or refusal of CSEA.
Consider potential hemodynamic instability and airway management challenges with general anesthesia.
Consider reduced complication risk and improved safety profile with CSEA.
Patient & Prescribing Data
44 patients undergoing PCNL, divided into general anesthesia and CSEA groups
CSEA may reduce postoperative analgesic requirements and support early mobilization; general anesthesia preferred for better airway and hemodynamic control especially in upper pole puncture cases.
Clinical Best Practices
Preoperative assessment should exclude patients with significant comorbidities contraindicating CSEA.
Use standardized satisfaction scoring (0–10 scale) for surgical team and anesthesia personnel to evaluate anesthesia effectiveness.
Ensure adequate preoperative hydration and sedation prior to CSEA.
Tailor anesthesia choice to patient condition, surgical complexity, and team expertise to optimize outcomes.
Monitor postoperative pain with VAS and adjust analgesia accordingly.