Intensive care infection score outperforms inflammatory biomarkers in detecting infection in critically ill patients - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Intensive Care Infection Score Detects Infection in Critically Ill Patients More Effectively Than Inflammatory Biomarkers

  • By

  • Noelle Nacke

  • Christian Hönemann

  • Bastian Blömer

  • Stefanie Klatte

  • Alexander Zarbock

  • Jens-Christian Schewe

  • Marie-Luise Rübsam

  • October 7, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Intensive Care Infection Score Detects Infection in Critically Ill Patients More Effectively Than Inflammatory Biomarkers

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionInfection in critically ill patients
Key MechanismsICIS combines selected blood-cell parameters representing innate and adaptive immune responses; higher scores indicate a greater probability of infection.
Target PopulationAdults aged 18 years or older admitted to an interdisciplinary ICU; the study excluded pregnant patients.
Care SettingInterdisciplinary ICU at a non-university secondary care hospital in Vechta, Germany.

Key Highlights

  • The study compared ICIS with CRP, PCT, and white blood cell count for infection diagnosis in critically ill patients.
  • ICIS ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores corresponding to a greater probability of infection.
  • ICIS parameters are obtained from whole blood using automated gating on Sysmex XN/XR-series hematology analyzers.
  • The study used a clinically adjudicated reference standard incorporating microbiological, clinical, and laboratory information.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The article describes infection and sepsis as clinical diagnoses that cannot be confirmed or excluded with reliable certainty by a single biomarker or diagnostic test.
  • The study's reference standard combined microbiological findings, clinical condition, laboratory findings, and overall probability of infection.

Management

  • The article discusses individualized strategies integrating biomarkers and immune-response scoring systems as a potential aid to early, patient-specific decision-making; it does not provide a treatment protocol.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • ICIS is a multiparameter score from 0 to 20; higher values correspond to a greater probability of infection.
  • The article reports that prior studies found ICIS results remained stable for up to 8 hours after blood sampling when analysis was delayed.

Risks

  • CRP, PCT, and IL-6 concentrations can be influenced by non-infectious conditions, including surgical stress and trauma.
  • Blood-culture-based diagnostics are the reference approach for pathogen detection but have recognized limitations in sensitivity and time to result.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Critically ill adults admitted to an ICU from 2021 through 2023; eligibility required written informed consent within 24 hours of ICU admission, and pregnancy was an exclusion criterion.

The article evaluates diagnostic tools, not a prescribed treatment. It notes that individualized diagnostic strategies may support antimicrobial stewardship, but the provided text reports no prescribing outcomes.

Clinical Best Practices

  • The article states that infection and sepsis remain clinical diagnoses and that no individual biomarker or diagnostic test can confirm or exclude them with reliable certainty.
  • The study's expert panel assessed cases using clinical, laboratory, and microbiological information.
  • The study classified infection and infection likely together, and infection unlikely and no infection together, for concordance analyses.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content