Practice variations in indication, timing and outcome of Multiple Myeloma patients undergoing surgery for vertebral lesions – results from the European M2Spine study group - Scorecard - MDSpire

Practice variations in indication, timing and outcome of Multiple Myeloma patients undergoing surgery for vertebral lesions – results from the European M2Spine study group

  • By

  • Vanessa Hubertus

  • Lennart Viezens

  • Martin Stangenberg

  • Anton M. Früh

  • Hanno S. Meyer

  • Raimunde Liang

  • Andreas Kramer

  • Christoph Orban

  • Johannes Kerschbaumer

  • Beate Kunze

  • Stefano Telera

  • Hannah Miller

  • Christian J. Entenmann

  • Emily J. von Bronewski

  • Charlotte Buhre

  • Leon-Gordian Leonhardt

  • Wolfgang Willenbacher

  • Irma Kvitsaridze

  • Dominik Laue

  • Matthias Pumberger

  • Theresa Keller

  • Güliz Acker

  • Jan Krönke

  • Igor-Wolfgang Blau

  • Ulrich Keller

  • Florian Ringel

  • Claudius Thomé

  • Bernhard Meyer

  • Peter Vajkoczy

  • Marc Dreimann

  • Julia Sophie Onken

  • June 13, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Variability in Surgical Indications, Timing, and Outcomes for Vertebral Lesions in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Findings from the European M2Spine Study Group

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMultiple Myeloma with vertebral column lesions
Key MechanismsPlasma cell malignancy causing bone lesions leading to fractures, pain, neurological deficits; bone fragility and immunocompromise complicate surgical decisions
Target PopulationAdult patients (≥18 years) with symptomatic vertebral lesions due to Multiple Myeloma
Care SettingTertiary academic spine centers with interdisciplinary teams including spine surgery, hematology, oncology, and radio-oncology

Key Highlights

  • 80% of MM patients develop bone complications; 50% involve vertebral lesions causing fractures, pain, and neurological risks
  • Non-surgical management predominates due to MM sensitivity to radio- and chemotherapy and high surgical infection risk
  • Surgical intervention considered when non-surgical treatment fails, especially for spinal instability or neurological deficits

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use ICD-10 codes C90 (Multiple Myeloma) and C79 (vertebral column lesion) for patient identification
  • Assess vertebral lesions with CT and MRI imaging
  • Evaluate spinal stability using Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)
  • Assess neurological and ambulatory status with modified McCormick Scale

Management

  • Predominantly non-surgical treatment including radio- and chemotherapy for vertebral lesions
  • Minimally invasive cement augmentation for persistent vertebral pain to reduce pain and improve independence
  • Surgical approaches (posterior instrumentation, fusion, decompression) reserved for spinal instability, neurological deficits, or failure of conservative treatment

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular follow-up with clinical and imaging assessments to monitor lesion progression and neurological status
  • Use ECOG, Karnofsky (KPS), and ASA scores to assess patient functional status during treatment
  • Monitor for complications post-surgery and neurological outcomes

Risks

  • High risk of surgical site infections due to immunocompromised status
  • Potential for delayed surgical intervention impacting neurological outcomes
  • Cement augmentation does not restore spinal stability or prevent deformities

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adult MM patients with symptomatic vertebral lesions treated between 2005 and 2023 at European tertiary centers

Interdisciplinary treatment decisions vary; lack of standardized surgical guidelines leads to variability in timing and indications for surgery

Clinical Best Practices

  • Employ interdisciplinary teams for comprehensive management of MM vertebral lesions
  • Use standardized scoring systems (SINS, Bilsky, McCormick) to guide treatment decisions
  • Prioritize non-surgical treatments initially due to MM radiosensitivity and infection risks
  • Consider minimally invasive cement augmentation for pain relief when conservative treatment fails
  • Reserve surgical intervention for spinal instability, neurological deficits, or refractory symptoms
  • Collect and analyze multicenter data to inform future evidence-based guidelines

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content