From ideas to long-term studies: 3D printing clinical trials review - Scorecard - MDSpire

From ideas to long-term studies: 3D printing clinical trials review

  • By

  • Jan Witowski

  • Mateusz Sitkowski

  • Tomasz Zuzak

  • Jasamine Coles-Black

  • Jason Chuen

  • Piotr Major

  • Michał Pdziwiatr

  • May 22, 2018

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials Involving 3D Printing in Medicine

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionVarious medical conditions across multiple specialties utilizing 3D printing technology
Key Mechanisms3D printing (3DP) technology applied for clinical decision-making, surgical planning, device fabrication, and educational purposes
Target PopulationPatients enrolled in clinical trials across diverse medical fields including Orthopedics, Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry, Cardiology, and others
Care SettingClinical centers conducting trials worldwide, predominantly in hospital and surgical settings

Key Highlights

  • 92 registered clinical trials involving 3DP with over 6,252 patients enrolled, showing rapid growth in clinical research since 2015
  • Most trials concentrated in Orthopedics (27.17%), Dentistry (14.13%), and Maxillofacial Surgery (10.87%), with China leading in number of studies
  • Current barriers to widespread adoption include high costs, segmentation difficulties, printing time, and lack of robust empirical evidence

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize 3DP models to enhance preoperative planning and improve anatomical understanding in complex cases

Management

  • Incorporate 3DP technology in surgical interventions primarily in Orthopedics, Maxillofacial Surgery, and Dentistry where evidence is emerging
  • Consider 3DP for patient-specific devices such as knee braces as investigated in multicenter trials

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Track clinical trial outcomes to evaluate efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 3DP applications
  • Monitor enrollment and completion status of ongoing studies to inform future clinical practice

Risks

  • Recognize current limitations including segmentation challenges, high costs, and printing time that may impact clinical workflow
  • Acknowledge the lack of extensive randomized controlled trials limiting definitive conclusions on clinical utility

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients enrolled in 3DP clinical trials across multiple specialties, predominantly Orthopedics, Dentistry, and Maxillofacial Surgery

Clinical trials are transitioning from feasibility studies to implementation and long-term evaluation phases, with results expected to clarify the clinical benefits and limitations of 3DP

Clinical Best Practices

  • Engage multidisciplinary teams to optimize 3DP integration in clinical workflows
  • Prioritize clinical trial participation to contribute to the growing evidence base
  • Address technical challenges such as segmentation and printing time to improve efficiency
  • Monitor emerging trial data to guide evidence-based adoption of 3DP technologies

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content