A prospective study of minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy and stereotactic brachytherapy for new brain oligometastases - Scorecard - MDSpire

A prospective study of minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy and stereotactic brachytherapy for new brain oligometastases

  • By

  • Smruti Mahapatra

  • Laurel Seltzer

  • Neydin Osorio

  • Michelle Miller

  • Andrew Janssen

  • Raj Mitra

  • Joseph Keen

  • Clayton Smith

  • Marcus Ware

  • June 7, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Prospective Investigation of Keyhole Craniotomy and Stereotactic Brachytherapy for Newly Diagnosed Brain Oligometastases

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMetastatic brain tumors (MBTs) presenting as newly diagnosed brain oligometastases
Key MechanismsCombination of minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy (MIKC) for tumor resection and Cesium-131 (Cs-131) stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) for targeted radiation delivery
Target PopulationAdults with 1–6 newly diagnosed brain metastases, KPS ≥ 60, ECOG ≤ 2, requiring craniotomy and radiation therapy
Care SettingSingle-center prospective clinical setting with neurosurgical and radiation oncology collaboration

Key Highlights

  • Cs-131 SBT offers advantages over I-125 including shorter half-life (9.7 days), higher dose rate, better dose distribution, and reduced radiation necrosis.
  • MIKC reduces surgical trauma, accelerates recovery, and allows access to difficult tumor locations compared to conventional craniotomy.
  • Combined MIKC and Cs-131 SBT aims to improve local tumor control, reduce radiation necrosis, and enhance functional outcomes in brain oligometastases.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use brain MRI with gadolinium to evaluate tumor location, size, and progression pre- and post-intervention.
  • Assess functional status with Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale.
  • Evaluate neurocognitive function using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
  • Assess quality of life with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) questionnaire.

Management

  • Perform surgical resection via minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy targeting dominant or largest metastasis when SRS is likely ineffective.
  • Implant Cs-131 stranded seeds into resection cavity for stereotactic brachytherapy with seed activity of 3–5 mCi each.
  • Calculate seed number based on tumor volume approximated as a sphere and resection cavity surface area.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Follow patients every two months with MRI and clinical assessments for up to two years or until local tumor progression.
  • Monitor for radiation necrosis, neurocognitive impairment, and neurological deficits.
  • Use Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-Brain Metastasis criteria to assess local progression.

Risks

  • Radiation necrosis risk is reduced with Cs-131 compared to I-125 due to shorter half-life and improved radiobiologic properties.
  • Potential neurological complications and neurocognitive decline associated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are minimized with targeted SBT.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults newly diagnosed with 1–6 brain metastases, KPS ≥ 60, ECOG ≤ 2, excluding those with >6 lesions, prior radiosurgery or WBRT to same lesion, hemorrhage history, or life expectancy <3 months.

Cs-131 SBT combined with MIKC provides effective local control with fewer complications and improved functional outcomes; seed activity tailored per tumor volume and cavity size.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Select patients based on functional status and tumor characteristics to optimize benefit from surgery and brachytherapy.
  • Utilize image guidance and minimally invasive techniques to maximize safe tumor resection and preserve neurological function.
  • Implement systematic follow-up with standardized neuro-oncology criteria and functional assessments to monitor treatment efficacy and toxicity.
  • Consider Cs-131 SBT for its favorable radiobiologic profile and reduced radiation necrosis risk compared to traditional isotopes.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content