Utility of New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in assessing bullfighting trauma: experience from a level I hospital - Scorecard - MDSpire

Utility of New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in assessing bullfighting trauma: experience from a level I hospital

  • By

  • Manuel José Torres-Jurado

  • Juan Ramón Gómez-López

  • Jeancarlos Jhosmer Trujillo-Díaz

  • Francesco Schenone

  • Ana Benítez-Riesco

  • María Pilar Concejo-Cutoli

  • Laura Vicente-González

  • Carlos Vaquero Puerta

  • Juan Carlos Martín-del Olmo

  • February 5, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) for Bullfighting-Related Injuries: Insights from a Level I Trauma Center

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBullfighting-related high-energy trauma
Key MechanismsGoring injuries causing open trauma predominantly to lower extremities and pelvis
Target PopulationPatients sustaining bullfighting-related injuries, primarily young adult males
Care SettingLevel I trauma center with surgical and intensive care capabilities

Key Highlights

  • Majority of bullfighting trauma cases are mild (NISS 1–9), but severe cases have higher morbidity and mortality.
  • NISS effectively stratifies injury severity and identifies patients needing urgent surgery or transfer.
  • Early surgical intervention, antibiotics, and tetanus prophylaxis contribute to favorable outcomes.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use New Injury Severity Score (NISS) to classify trauma severity into mild, moderate, moderate–severe, and severe categories.
  • Assess injury location focusing on lower extremities, pelvis, abdomen, chest, and neck.
  • Identify life-threatening complications such as pelvic fractures and intestinal perforations.

Management

  • Perform early surgical interventions including debridement, lavage, wound closure, and midline laparotomies for severe cases.
  • Administer broad-spectrum antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis.
  • Consider interhospital transfer for moderate–severe trauma patients requiring higher-level care.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor for postoperative complications, especially wound infections.
  • Track need for reoperation and evaluate for signs of haemorrhagic shock.
  • Observe older patients closely due to higher risk of severe trauma.

Risks

  • High risk of hypovolemic or septic shock leading to mortality in severe trauma cases.
  • Increased morbidity and mortality associated with abdominal and thoracic injuries.
  • Potential for postoperative complications including infections and need for reoperation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

154 bullfighting trauma patients, predominantly male, median age 32 years

92.2% required surgical intervention; early surgery and prophylactic antibiotics improved survival; mortality rate low at 0.6%

Clinical Best Practices

  • Apply NISS scoring promptly to guide triage and treatment prioritization.
  • Ensure rapid surgical management for moderate–severe and severe trauma patients.
  • Implement broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage and tetanus prophylaxis routinely.
  • Plan for interhospital transfer when indicated by injury severity and resource availability.
  • Conduct close postoperative monitoring to detect and manage complications early.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content