Hospitalization profiles and complications across ICD and CRT-D implantations in Germany: data from the VIDEO study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Hospitalization profiles and complications across ICD and CRT-D implantations in Germany: data from the VIDEO study

  • By

  • Tugba Aktemur Oezalp

  • Kohei Ukita

  • Thomas Riemer

  • Jochen Senges

  • Johannes Brachmann

  • Thorsten Lewalter

  • Thomas Deneke

  • Nicolas Doll

  • Lars Eckardt

  • Daniel Steven

  • Ibrahim Akin

  • Roland Richard Tilz

  • April 16, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Analysis of Hospitalization Patterns and Complications Related to ICD and CRT-D Implantations in Germany: Insights from the VIDEO Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPrevention of sudden cardiac death and management of heart failure with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds)
Key MechanismsICDs prevent life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias; CRT-Ds provide biventricular pacing to address electrical dyssynchrony in heart failure
Target PopulationPatients undergoing ICD or CRT-D implantation, including those with ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and electrical conduction abnormalities
Care SettingCardiology and electrophysiology units in hospital inpatient settings across Germany

Key Highlights

  • CRT-D patients were older and had higher rates of obesity, diabetes, renal disease, and permanent atrial fibrillation compared to single- and dual-chamber ICD recipients.
  • Dual-chamber ICD recipients had a higher prevalence of psychological/behavioral disorders and history of sudden cardiac arrest.
  • Less than half of CRT-D recipients had complete left bundle branch block, indicating many implants were performed outside classical guideline criteria.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use electrocardiogram to identify left bundle branch block and atrial fibrillation status.
  • Assess comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, renal failure, and psychological disorders prior to device implantation.

Management

  • Select device type (single-chamber ICD, dual-chamber ICD, or CRT-D) based on patient age, comorbidities, and cardiac conduction abnormalities.
  • Consider CRT-D implantation primarily for patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony, acknowledging some patients may not meet classical criteria.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor peri-procedural ICU admission rates, length of ICU stay, and need for mechanical ventilation post-implantation.
  • Track major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including myocardial infarction, stroke, and in-hospital mortality.

Risks

  • Higher procedural complexity and lead-related complications associated with dual-chamber ICDs.
  • Increased peri-procedural risk and comorbidities in CRT-D recipients necessitate careful perioperative management.

Patient & Prescribing Data

2,001 patients undergoing ICD or CRT-D implantation across 11 German centers between 2018 and 2023

CRT-D patients tend to be older with more comorbidities; dual-chamber ICD patients have higher psychological disorder prevalence; device selection should consider individual patient risk profiles and comorbid conditions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform comprehensive pre-implantation assessment including ECG, comorbidities, and patient history to guide device selection.
  • Adjust peri-procedural management strategies based on device type and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.
  • Utilize standardized data collection (e.g., §21 data) for continuous quality improvement and resource allocation.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content