Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Preventive Therapies for Vestibular Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Preventive Therapies for Vestibular Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

  • By

  • Sindhu Vasireddy

  • Shankar Biswas

  • Raja Kollu

  • Elangovan Krishnan

  • Mohammed Semaal Khan

  • Fasil C

  • Arjun Jayakumar

  • Reena Acharya

  • December 30, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Preventive Therapies for Vestibular Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionVestibular Migraine
Key MechanismsCGRP monoclonal antibodies and traditional migraine preventives
Target PopulationAdults (≥ 18 years) with vestibular migraine
Care SettingClinical settings with access to preventive treatments

Key Highlights

  • All medications significantly reduced vertigo attacks.
  • Propranolol showed the largest benefits among traditional migraine preventives.
  • CGRP antibody galcanezumab demonstrated the strongest evidence quality and best tolerability.
  • Network meta-analysis allows for indirect comparisons of treatments.
  • Direct comparison studies are needed for clearer clinical guidance.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis according to Bárány Society/International Headache Society criteria or Neuhauser criteria.

Management

  • Consider traditional preventive medications and CGRP antagonists for treatment.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor change in monthly vertigo frequency/days and quality of life.

Risks

  • Potential for bias in diagnostic definitions and treatment comparisons.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults with vestibular migraine, 1-3% prevalence in the general population.

Preventive treatments administered for ≥ 12 weeks, including beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and CGRP antagonists.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize network meta-analysis for comprehensive treatment comparisons.
  • Balance effectiveness with evidence quality and side effects in treatment selection.
  • Encourage further research on head-to-head comparisons of promising treatments.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content