Limited clinical efficacy of azacitidine in transfusion-dependent, growth factor-resistant, low- and Int-1-risk MDS: Results from the nordic NMDSG08A phase II trial - Scorecard - MDSpire

Limited clinical efficacy of azacitidine in transfusion-dependent, growth factor-resistant, low- and Int-1-risk MDS: Results from the nordic NMDSG08A phase II trial

  • By

  • M Tobiasson

  • I Dybedahl

  • M S Holm

  • M Karimi

  • L Brandefors

  • H Garelius

  • M Grövdal

  • I Högh-Dufva

  • K Grønbæk

  • M Jansson

  • C Marcher

  • L Nilsson

  • A O Kittang

  • A Porwit

  • L Saft

  • L Möllgård

  • E Hellström-Lindberg

  • March 7, 2014

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Efficacy of Azacitidine in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent, Growth Factor-Resistant Low- and Intermediate-1-Risk MDS: Findings from the Nordic NMDSG08A Phase II Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionLow- and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with transfusion dependence and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA)
Key MechanismsAzacitidine (Aza) as a hypomethylating agent targeting malignant hematopoietic stem cells to induce transfusion independence
Target PopulationPatients aged ≥18 years with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS, transfusion-dependent, refractory to ESA±G-CSF, with specific transfusion thresholds and predictive model criteria
Care SettingMulticenter clinical trial setting with hematology specialty care and close monitoring

Key Highlights

  • Anemia is the predominant symptom in low- and intermediate-1-risk MDS, with about 50% responding to ESA treatment.
  • Patients refractory to ESA with transfusion needs ≥2 units/4 weeks and serum erythropoietin >500 U/l have low response rates (~7%) and require alternative therapies.
  • Azacitidine demonstrated limited overall efficacy and considerable toxicity in ESA-resistant, transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS patients in this phase II trial.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis based on IPSS risk stratification (low or intermediate-1), bone marrow morphology, and transfusion dependence.
  • Use of predictive model incorporating serum erythropoietin levels and transfusion rate to assess ESA response probability.

Management

  • For ESA-resistant, transfusion-dependent patients, azacitidine monotherapy (75 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 28 days) administered for six cycles.
  • Addition of erythropoietin beta (60,000 units/week) after six cycles if transfusion dependence persists.
  • Dose adjustments or temporary discontinuation of azacitidine in case of severe hematological or non-hematological toxicity.
  • Use of G-CSF allowed during treatment as clinically indicated.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Assessment of transfusion independence after six and nine cycles of treatment.
  • Regular monitoring of blood counts and toxicity grading per NCI CTC version 3.0.
  • Bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics evaluated at baseline, week 28, and week 45.
  • Monitoring for hematological toxicity with thresholds for ANC and platelet counts guiding dose modifications.

Risks

  • Considerable toxicity associated with azacitidine, including cytopenias requiring dose adjustments.
  • Potential worsening of quality of life due to transfusion dependence if treatment is ineffective.
  • Risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia inherent to MDS.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults with low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS, transfusion-dependent and refractory to ESA treatment.

Azacitidine showed limited efficacy in inducing transfusion independence in this population, with an overall response rate lower than previously reported in non-ESA-resistant cohorts; toxicity was significant, necessitating careful patient selection and monitoring.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use predictive models incorporating serum erythropoietin and transfusion rates to identify ESA resistance before initiating azacitidine.
  • Administer azacitidine at 75 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days every 28 days for six cycles, with evaluation of transfusion independence.
  • Add erythropoietin beta after six cycles if transfusion dependence persists to potentially enhance response.
  • Monitor hematologic parameters closely and adjust azacitidine dosing or delay cycles in case of severe toxicity.
  • Employ G-CSF support as needed to manage neutropenia during treatment.
  • Perform bone marrow assessments at baseline and during treatment to evaluate morphological and cytogenetic changes.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content