Comparison between olfactory bulb and olfactory tract implantations through an endoscopic supraorbital keyhole approach: a cadaveric study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

A Cadaveric Study on the Endoscopic Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for Implantation of the Olfactory Bulb versus the Olfactory Tract

  • By

  • Hakim Benkhatar

  • Douglas Henderson

  • Teofil Mures

  • Claire Martin

  • Damien Bresson

  • December 22, 2025

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Cadaveric Study on the Endoscopic Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for Implantation of the Olfactory Bulb versus the Olfactory Tract

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionOlfactory loss (anosmia) often post-viral or post-traumatic
Key MechanismsElectrical stimulation of olfactory pathways via implants targeting olfactory mucosa, bulb, or central olfactory networks
Target PopulationPatients with olfactory loss, especially post-COVID-19 anosmia
Care SettingSurgical implantation via endoscopic supraorbital keyhole approach in specialized neurosurgical or otolaryngology centers

Key Highlights

  • Olfactory loss significantly impairs quality of life and increases depression risk.
  • Olfactory implants involve gas sensors and electrode arrays targeting olfactory mucosa, bulb, or tract.
  • Supraorbital keyhole approach allows minimally invasive access to olfactory bulb and tract for electrode implantation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Identify olfactory loss etiology including post-viral or post-traumatic causes.
  • Consider anatomical variability of olfactory bulb and tract via imaging prior to implantation.

Management

  • Electrical stimulation via olfactory implants targeting dorsal olfactory bulb or ventral olfactory tract.
  • Prefer non-lesional, reversible electrode placement on dorsal olfactory bulb to preserve residual function.
  • Consider ventral olfactory tract implantation for easier, more stable electrode placement without orbital roof drilling.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor electrode stability intraoperatively and postoperatively to prevent displacement.
  • Assess olfactory function and patient safety post-implantation.
  • Evaluate for potential complications related to surgical approach and electrode placement.

Risks

  • Potential electrode displacement due to cerebrospinal fluid flow in olfactory cistern.
  • Surgical risks related to orbital roof drilling when accessing olfactory bulb.
  • Possible damage to olfactory structures if electrode placement is invasive or requires detachment.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Individuals with olfactory loss, particularly post-COVID-19 anosmia or traumatic anosmia

Olfactory implants using a 12-contact electrode array can be placed via supraorbital keyhole approach; ventral olfactory tract implantation may offer improved stability and less invasive access compared to dorsal olfactory bulb implantation.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use a supraorbital keyhole approach with a 2 × 3 cm craniotomy above the orbital roof for electrode implantation.
  • Avoid orbital roof drilling when targeting the olfactory tract to reduce operative time and invasiveness.
  • Place electrodes on the dorsal olfactory bulb to preserve residual olfactory function and allow reversibility.
  • Consider anatomical variations and vascular structures to optimize electrode placement and minimize complications.
  • Employ endoscopic visualization and angled instruments for precise electrode positioning.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content