PAM: a propagation-based model for segmenting any 3D objects across multi-modal medical images - Scorecard - MDSpire

PAM: a propagation-based model for segmenting any 3D objects across multi-modal medical images

  • By

  • Zifan Chen

  • Xinyu Nan

  • Jiazheng Li

  • Jie Zhao

  • Haifeng Li

  • Ziling Lin

  • Haoshen Li

  • Heyun Chen

  • Yiting Liu

  • Lei Tang

  • Li Zhang

  • Bin Dong

  • December 2, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: PAM: A Propagation Framework for 3D Object Segmentation in Multi-Modal Medical Imaging

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionVolumetric segmentation of anatomical structures in 3D medical images
Key MechanismsPropagation-based framework combining CNN-based UNet for intra-slice features with Transformer attention for inter-slice propagation
Target PopulationPatients undergoing medical imaging across diverse modalities (CT, MRI, PET-CT, SRX) requiring 3D segmentation
Care SettingClinical imaging and diagnostic settings requiring efficient and accurate volumetric segmentation

Key Highlights

  • PAM generates accurate 3D segmentations from minimal 2D prompts, reducing manual annotation burden
  • Outperforms existing models (MedSAM, SegVol) with 19.3% average DSC improvement across 44 datasets
  • Demonstrates robust performance across diverse objects, modalities, and prompt variations with faster inference and 63.6% reduced user interaction time

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize PAM to assist in precise volumetric segmentation of organs, lesions, and tissues across multiple imaging modalities
  • Apply minimal 2D prompts to initiate segmentation, leveraging PAM’s propagation for 3D continuity

Management

  • Incorporate PAM into clinical workflows to reduce time and labor associated with manual 3D segmentation
  • Prefer PAM over Type I (MedSAM) and Type II (SegVol) models for improved generalizability and efficiency

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor segmentation accuracy and consistency across slices to ensure reliable volumetric delineation
  • Evaluate performance stability under varying prompt inputs and propagation settings

Risks

  • Be aware of potential limitations in segmenting highly regular objects where PAM’s improvements may be less pronounced
  • Consider computational resource availability despite PAM’s efficiency gains compared to 3D convolutional models

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients requiring 3D segmentation of anatomical structures from multi-modal medical imaging

PAM reduces reliance on extensive manual annotation and task-specific retraining, enabling faster and more generalizable segmentation to support diagnosis and treatment planning

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use minimal 2D prompts to initiate segmentation and leverage PAM’s propagation for volumetric continuity
  • Validate segmentation outputs against clinical standards to ensure accuracy across diverse anatomical structures
  • Integrate PAM into imaging workflows to optimize user interaction time and computational efficiency
  • Prefer PAM for irregularly shaped objects where segmentation improvements are most significant

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content