Minimally interactive segmentation of soft-tissue tumors on CT and MRI using deep learning - Scorecard - MDSpire

Minimally interactive segmentation of soft-tissue tumors on CT and MRI using deep learning

  • By

  • Douwe J. Spaanderman

  • Martijn P. A. Starmans

  • Gonnie C. M. van Erp

  • David F. Hanff

  • Judith H. Sluijter

  • Anne-Rose W. Schut

  • Geert J. L. H. van Leenders

  • Cornelis Verhoef

  • Dirk J. Grünhagen

  • Wiro J. Niessen

  • Jacob J. Visser

  • Stefan Klein

  • November 19, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Automated Segmentation of Soft-Tissue Tumors in CT and MRI Using Deep Learning Techniques

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSoft-tissue tumors (STTs) with variable progression and broad differentiation
Key MechanismsMinimally interactive deep learning segmentation using interior margin points and exponentialized geodesic distance maps combined with 3D CNN
Target PopulationPatients with soft-tissue tumors undergoing CT or MRI imaging
Care SettingRadiology and oncology clinical settings requiring tumor delineation for radiotherapy planning and quantitative imaging

Key Highlights

  • Manual segmentation of STTs is time-consuming, costly, and observer-dependent, necessitating automated methods.
  • InteractiveNet uses six user-defined interior margin points to guide segmentation, improving generalizability and efficiency.
  • The method integrates best practices from the nnU-Net framework and was validated on heterogeneous public datasets including WORC and TCIA.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use CT or T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI for imaging STTs.
  • Employ manual reference segmentations by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists for ground truth.

Management

  • Apply minimally interactive deep learning segmentation methods to assist tumor delineation.
  • Use six interior margin points to define volume of interest and generate exponentialized geodesic distance maps to guide segmentation.
  • Incorporate state-of-the-art CNN architectures such as nnU-Net for improved accuracy.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Evaluate segmentation accuracy against manual reference segmentations on independent datasets.
  • Use volume and diameter measurements derived from segmentations for clinical assessment.

Risks

  • Fully automatic segmentation methods may perform sub-optimally due to STT heterogeneity.
  • Insufficient user interaction points may lead to incomplete tumor encapsulation and inaccurate segmentation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with soft-tissue tumors undergoing imaging for diagnosis or treatment planning

Minimally interactive segmentation reduces physician workload and improves segmentation accuracy compared to fully automatic methods, facilitating clinical decision-making.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Obtain six interior margin points in three orthogonal planes to define tumor boundaries accurately.
  • Use exponentialized geodesic distance maps to enhance tumor voxel identification based on intensity and spatial differences.
  • Integrate preprocessing, network architecture optimization, training, post-processing, and ensembling from nnU-Net framework for robust segmentation.
  • Validate segmentation models on heterogeneous, multi-center datasets to ensure generalizability.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content