Uncertainty-aware and causal test-time adaptive foundation model for robust colorectal cancer pathology diagnosis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Uncertainty-aware and causal test-time adaptive foundation model for robust colorectal cancer pathology diagnosis

  • By

  • Shenghan Lou

  • Genshen Mo

  • Xiao Zhang

  • Hao Wang

  • Hao Li

  • Keru Ma

  • Huiying Li

  • Xinyue Zhang

  • Meihong Yan

  • Haonan Xie

  • Yuze Huang

  • Chuangqi Li

  • Siyuan Ma

  • Hongxue Meng

  • Lei Cao

  • Peng Han

  • December 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Causally Adaptive Foundation Model with Uncertainty Awareness for Enhanced Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Pathology

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionColorectal cancer (CRC)
Key MechanismsHistopathological assessment of H&E stained whole-slide images enhanced by uncertainty-aware and causally adaptive foundation model integrating epistemic-aleatoric uncertainty decomposition, causal test-time adaptation, and post-hoc calibration
Target PopulationPatients undergoing colorectal cancer diagnosis via histopathology across heterogeneous clinical settings
Care SettingMulti-institutional pathology laboratories and clinical diagnostic workflows

Key Highlights

  • UAD-FM model addresses domain shifts, unreliable uncertainty estimation, and spurious correlations limiting clinical reliability in CRC pathology models.
  • Incorporates epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty quantification, causal representation learning, and entropy-based test-time adaptation for robust inference.
  • Produces interpretable uncertainty maps enabling human-AI collaboration and defers uncertain cases to pathologists for safe clinical deployment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use histopathological examination of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole-slide images as the diagnostic gold standard for CRC.
  • Employ computational pathology models with uncertainty quantification to support diagnosis and grading.
  • Incorporate causal representation learning to reduce spurious correlations and improve robustness across centers.

Management

  • Integrate foundation models like UAD-FM that adapt to domain shifts via test-time adaptation without requiring source data access.
  • Use calibrated prediction confidence to defer uncertain cases to human experts, ensuring trustworthy clinical decisions.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor model calibration and uncertainty estimates continuously to maintain reliability across heterogeneous datasets.
  • Assess model performance across multi-institutional cohorts to detect domain shifts and adapt accordingly.

Risks

  • Be aware of risks from domain shift due to staining variability, scanner differences, and patient population heterogeneity.
  • Recognize limitations of models lacking uncertainty quantification which may lead to erroneous clinical decisions.
  • Consider spurious correlations from non-causal morphological features that can compromise model robustness.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients undergoing colorectal cancer histopathological diagnosis across diverse clinical centers.

While not directly prescribing treatment, UAD-FM supports accurate diagnosis and grading, facilitating appropriate clinical management decisions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Adopt computational pathology models that provide both high accuracy and reliable uncertainty estimates for CRC diagnosis.
  • Implement causal test-time adaptation strategies to maintain model generalizability in multi-center settings.
  • Use interpretable uncertainty maps to enhance human-AI collaboration and improve diagnostic confidence.
  • Defer uncertain model predictions to expert pathologists to ensure patient safety and diagnostic accuracy.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content