Hydroxyethyl starch for prehospital fluid resuscitation: results of two helicopter emergency medical service operators in Germany - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Hydroxyethyl Starch for Prehospital Fluid Resuscitation: Findings from Two German Helicopter Emergency Medical Services

  • By

  • Manuel F. Struck

  • Daniel Werner

  • Marcus Rudolph

  • Peter Hilbert-Carius

  • October 21, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Hydroxyethyl Starch for Prehospital Fluid Resuscitation: Findings from Two German Helicopter Emergency Medical Services

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPrehospital fluid resuscitation for emergency patients with shock or risk of hemodynamic deterioration
Key MechanismsHydroxyethyl starch (HES) was proposed to provide hemodynamic effects superior to crystalloids; concerns include hemostatic disturbances, bleeding complications, and organ failure.
Target PopulationEmergency patients receiving prehospital fluid resuscitation, including patients with shock or major bleeding
Care SettingGerman helicopter emergency medical services; the study describes HES use and does not establish treatment efficacy or safety.

Key Highlights

  • Across more than one million patient-contact missions in two German helicopter EMS databases, HES use declined over the observation periods.
  • At ADAC, HES use fell from 3,104 cases (13.4%) in 2004 to 81 (0.2%) in 2022.
  • At DRF, HES use fell from 1,564 cases (4.6%) in 2012 to 105 (0.3%) in 2022.
  • The authors report that crystalloids now constitute the principal prehospital fluid therapy.
  • The authors state that the safety of HES 130/04 for EMS use remains to be established, particularly for patients with major bleeding, circulatory shock, or impaired permeability.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

    • The article reports that guidelines advised restricting crystalloid volumes to prevent overinfusion and dilution of coagulation factors, especially in trauma patients.
    • The article states that European regulatory action nearly eliminated HES products from 2013 onward, with the phase-out completed by 2022.

    Monitoring & Follow-up

      Risks

      • The article describes concerns about HES-associated hemostatic disturbances, bleeding complications, and organ failure.
      • The authors state that elective-surgery evidence does not establish HES 130/04 safety for prehospital patients with major bleeding, circulatory shock, or impaired permeability.

      Patient & Prescribing Data

      The databases covered missions involving patient contact by ADAC and DRF helicopter EMS; patient-level clinical characteristics and outcomes were not reported.

      HES use was rare by 2022 in both databases. The study describes utilization trends and does not compare patient outcomes or establish a preferred fluid regimen.

      Clinical Best Practices

      • The authors advise operators to recognize why HES products were abandoned and account for potential risks of organ failure and bleeding complications.
      • The authors state that HES 130/04 safety for prehospital emergency use remains to be established.
      • The authors call for further research to determine whether crystalloid regimens should continue or HES 130/04 can be used safely for prehospital resuscitation.

      Related Resources & Content

      Original Source(s)

      Related Content