Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGF/VEGFR monotherapy versus its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGF/VEGFR monotherapy versus its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

  • By

  • Min Duan

  • Yanjun Liu

  • Kexin Qiao

  • Zuojing Li

  • Dongsheng Zong

  • January 21, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGF/VEGFR monotherapy versus its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAdvanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC/mRCC)
Key MechanismsTargeting VEGF/VEGFR-mediated angiogenesis and immune checkpoint pathways to inhibit tumor growth and immune evasion
Target PopulationPatients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including subgroups by IMDC risk and Asian populations
Care SettingOncology clinical settings managing systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic RCC

Key Highlights

  • VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors improve objective response rate and progression-free survival but resistance and toxicity limit monotherapy efficacy.
  • Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with anti-VEGF therapies enhances anticancer activity and survival benefits compared to monotherapy.
  • Safety profiles differ among regimens; combination therapies may increase grade ≥3 adverse events, complicating treatment selection.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis based on clinical, pathological, and staging criteria for RCC including metastatic assessment.

Management

  • Use VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapies (TKIs, monoclonal antibodies) as systemic treatment for aRCC.
  • Consider combination therapy of ICIs with anti-VEGF agents to improve efficacy in advanced/metastatic RCC.
  • Individualize treatment selection based on patient risk stratification (e.g., IMDC risk groups) and toxicity profiles.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor for treatment-related adverse events, especially hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome.
  • Assess progression-free survival and overall survival to evaluate treatment effectiveness.

Risks

  • Combination therapies may have higher incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events compared to monotherapy.
  • Potential for resistance development during anti-VEGF monotherapy.
  • Toxicity profiles vary significantly among different regimens, requiring careful patient monitoring.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including diverse risk groups and ethnic populations (e.g., Asian patients).

Combination of ICIs with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors shows superior efficacy but with increased toxicity; treatment choice should balance benefits and risks.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate patient risk stratification (IMDC criteria) when selecting first-line therapy.
  • Consider combination regimens for improved survival outcomes in appropriate patients.
  • Closely monitor and manage adverse events to maintain treatment adherence and quality of life.
  • Stay updated with evolving clinical trial data and guideline recommendations to optimize individualized treatment.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content