Patients with Obesity Undergoing Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Fundoplication for Refractory GERD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Patients with Obesity Undergoing Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Fundoplication for Refractory GERD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Clinical Scorecard: Comparative Outcomes of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Fundoplication in Obese Patients with Refractory GERD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical therapy in obese patients
Key Mechanisms
Increased intra-abdominal pressure, hiatal hernia prevalence, gastric compression by visceral fat, esophageal dysmotility, hormonal influences from peripheral estrogen conversion
Target Population
Adults aged 18–70 years with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m²) and refractory GERD
Care Setting
Surgical intervention settings including bariatric and gastrointestinal surgery centers
Key Highlights
RYGB is considered the gold-standard surgical technique for severe obesity (BMI > 40) with superior reflux control by diverting gastric acid away from the esophagus.
Fundoplication shows higher reflux recurrence rates in obese patients but similar perioperative complications and recovery compared to RYGB.
Evidence is conflicting for moderate obesity (BMI 30–40) regarding whether fundoplication alone or RYGB provides better long-term reflux control.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use objective measures such as postoperative DeMeester score (<14.1) and validated symptom questionnaires (GERD-HRQL, RSI, GERSS) to assess GERD resolution.
Management
Consider RYGB as the preferred surgical option for patients with severe obesity and refractory GERD.
Fundoplication remains an option but may have higher reflux recurrence in obese patients.
In cases of failed fundoplication, RYGB is recommended over redo-fundoplication for definitive reflux control.
When RYGB is contraindicated, novel procedures like Nissen-sleeve may be considered.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Monitor for postoperative complications including intraoperative events, dysphagia, and need for reoperation.
Assess weight loss outcomes using percentage of total weight loss (%TWL).
Risks
Higher reflux recurrence rates after fundoplication in obese patients.
Potential perioperative complications comparable between RYGB and fundoplication.
Consideration of patient-specific factors such as presence of large paraesophageal hernias or Barrett’s esophagus.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Adults with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m²) and refractory GERD undergoing primary surgical intervention
RYGB offers superior reflux control especially in severe obesity, with comparable morbidity to fundoplication; fundoplication may be less effective long-term in obese patients.
Clinical Best Practices
Perform comprehensive preoperative evaluation including objective reflux testing and symptom assessment.
Select surgical intervention based on obesity severity, reflux severity, and patient comorbidities.
Consider RYGB preferentially in patients with BMI > 40 or failed prior fundoplication.
Use validated outcome measures to monitor postoperative reflux resolution and weight loss.
Tailor surgical approach in patients with complex presentations such as large hernias or Barrett’s esophagus.