H&E-based MSI/MMR testing with AI in colorectal cancer: a multi-centred blinded evaluation - Scorecard - MDSpire

H&E-based MSI/MMR testing with AI in colorectal cancer: a multi-centred blinded evaluation

  • By

  • Cher Bass

  • Foivos Ntelemis

  • Julian Schmidt

  • Steffen Wolf

  • André Geraldes

  • Debapriya Mehrotra

  • Shikha Singhal

  • Narender Kumar

  • Angelica Marcia

  • Nicholas Bennett

  • Oscar Maiques

  • Mitchell Hyde

  • Bejal Mistry

  • Grace Rogerson

  • Michele Cummings

  • Clare Freer

  • Elizabeth Walsh

  • Manuel Salto-Tellez

  • Maurice Loughrey

  • In Hwa Um

  • David J. Harrison

  • Richard Clarkson

  • James Blackwood

  • J. Carl Barrett

  • Jakob Nikolas Kather

  • Nicolas M. Orsi

  • Pahini Pandya

  • Salim Arslan

  • December 15, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: AI-Enhanced H&E-Based Assessment of MSI and MMR in Colorectal Cancer: A Blinded Multi-Center Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionColorectal cancer with mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability
Key MechanismsMismatch repair deficiency leads to microsatellite instability, detectable via AI analysis of H&E-stained slides
Target PopulationPatients with colorectal cancer undergoing MSI/MMR status assessment
Care SettingPathology laboratories and oncology diagnostic workflows in hospital and clinical settings

Key Highlights

  • Mismatch repair deficiency occurs in 10–20% of colorectal cancers and is critical for guiding treatment decisions.
  • PANProfiler Colorectal (PPC) uses AI to determine MSI/MMR status directly from routine H&E-stained slides with high accuracy.
  • Blinded multi-center validation showed PPC achieved over 93% overall agreement with standard MSI/MMR testing methods.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • MSI/MMR testing is recommended for all colorectal cancer patients by NICE, ESMO, ASCO, and CAP.
  • Current standard methods include immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PCR-based MSI testing.
  • AI-based assessment from H&E slides offers a rapid, cost-effective alternative to conventional testing.

Management

  • MSI-H and dMMR status guide immunotherapy decisions, with high response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Accurate MSI/MMR testing informs prognosis and identifies candidates for Lynch syndrome testing.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular assessment of MSI/MMR status is important for treatment planning and monitoring therapeutic response.

Risks

  • IHC interpretation can be subject to inter-observer variability.
  • PCR testing may be limited by poor DNA quality from FFPE samples.
  • Delays and costs associated with conventional testing can impact timely treatment decisions.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Colorectal cancer patients undergoing MSI/MMR status evaluation

MSI-H/dMMR tumors show approximately 50% response rates to immunotherapy in metastatic CRC and up to 100% in early-stage disease.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement universal MSI/MMR testing for all colorectal cancer patients as per international guidelines.
  • Utilize AI-based tools like PANProfiler Colorectal to enhance accessibility, reduce turnaround times, and lower costs.
  • Interpret AI results in conjunction with clinical and pathological findings to guide treatment decisions.
  • Ensure quality control and validation of AI tools across diverse clinical settings and populations.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content