False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial - Scorecard - MDSpire

False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

  • By

  • Kristin Johnson

  • Jakob Olinder

  • Aldana Rosso

  • Ingvar Andersson

  • Kristina Lång

  • Sophia Zackrisson

  • May 5, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating False-Positive Recall Rates in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBreast cancer screening
Key MechanismsComparison of false-positive recall rates and radiographic appearances between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM)
Target PopulationWomen aged 40 to 74 years undergoing breast cancer screening
Care SettingPopulation-based breast cancer screening programs

Key Highlights

  • False-positive recalls are common in breast cancer screening and can cause psychosocial distress and reduced re-attendance.
  • The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST) compared one-view DBT with two-view DM in a prospective, population-based setting.
  • False-positive recall rates and radiographic appearances differ between DBT and DM, with DBT showing a higher rate initially due to stellate distortions but a learning curve over time.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use both DBT and DM independently read by experienced radiologists to identify suspicious findings.
  • Classify false-positive findings by radiographic appearance including stellate distortion, circumscribed mass, indistinct density, architectural distortion, focal asymmetry, and calcifications.
  • Confirm breast cancer diagnosis through cross-linkage with cancer registries and biopsy results.

Management

  • Recalled women undergo further imaging (DM, ultrasound) and, if indicated, fine needle aspiration or core needle biopsy.
  • Work-up protocols should include multidisciplinary consensus review for unclear imaging findings.
  • Surgical procedures reserved for cases requiring open biopsy or breast-conserving surgery.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Track work-up time from screening to cancer exclusion, including all imaging and clinical visits.
  • Follow women until next scheduled screening (18 to 24 months) to monitor outcomes and re-attendance.
  • Monitor false-positive recall rates over time to assess learning curve effects.

Risks

  • False-positive recalls may cause psychosocial distress and reduce future screening attendance.
  • Higher false-positive recall rates with DBT initially, especially due to stellate distortions, may lead to increased biopsies and interventions.
  • Risk of breast cancer is higher in women after a false-positive mammography screening compared to true negatives.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Women aged 40 to 74 years participating in breast cancer screening in Malmö, Sweden

One-view DBT screening may initially yield higher false-positive recalls than two-view DM, but rates decrease over time indicating a learning curve; combined imaging and biopsy protocols are essential for accurate diagnosis.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement independent double reading of DBT and DM images by experienced breast radiologists.
  • Categorize false-positive findings by detailed radiographic appearance to guide work-up.
  • Use multidisciplinary consensus panels for ambiguous imaging findings to reduce unnecessary recalls.
  • Adopt standardized work-up protocols including imaging and biopsy to confirm benign outcomes.
  • Monitor false-positive recall rates longitudinally to optimize screening performance and reduce patient distress.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content