Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating False-Positive Recall Rates in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Study
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Breast cancer screening
Key Mechanisms
Comparison of false-positive recall rates and radiographic appearances between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM)
Target Population
Women aged 40 to 74 years undergoing breast cancer screening
Care Setting
Population-based breast cancer screening programs
Key Highlights
False-positive recalls are common in breast cancer screening and can cause psychosocial distress and reduced re-attendance.
The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST) compared one-view DBT with two-view DM in a prospective, population-based setting.
False-positive recall rates and radiographic appearances differ between DBT and DM, with DBT showing a higher rate initially due to stellate distortions but a learning curve over time.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use both DBT and DM independently read by experienced radiologists to identify suspicious findings.
Classify false-positive findings by radiographic appearance including stellate distortion, circumscribed mass, indistinct density, architectural distortion, focal asymmetry, and calcifications.
Confirm breast cancer diagnosis through cross-linkage with cancer registries and biopsy results.
Management
Recalled women undergo further imaging (DM, ultrasound) and, if indicated, fine needle aspiration or core needle biopsy.
Work-up protocols should include multidisciplinary consensus review for unclear imaging findings.
Surgical procedures reserved for cases requiring open biopsy or breast-conserving surgery.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Track work-up time from screening to cancer exclusion, including all imaging and clinical visits.
Follow women until next scheduled screening (18 to 24 months) to monitor outcomes and re-attendance.
Monitor false-positive recall rates over time to assess learning curve effects.
Risks
False-positive recalls may cause psychosocial distress and reduce future screening attendance.
Higher false-positive recall rates with DBT initially, especially due to stellate distortions, may lead to increased biopsies and interventions.
Risk of breast cancer is higher in women after a false-positive mammography screening compared to true negatives.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Women aged 40 to 74 years participating in breast cancer screening in Malmö, Sweden
One-view DBT screening may initially yield higher false-positive recalls than two-view DM, but rates decrease over time indicating a learning curve; combined imaging and biopsy protocols are essential for accurate diagnosis.
Clinical Best Practices
Implement independent double reading of DBT and DM images by experienced breast radiologists.
Categorize false-positive findings by detailed radiographic appearance to guide work-up.
Use multidisciplinary consensus panels for ambiguous imaging findings to reduce unnecessary recalls.
Adopt standardized work-up protocols including imaging and biopsy to confirm benign outcomes.
Monitor false-positive recall rates longitudinally to optimize screening performance and reduce patient distress.
Sexual dysfunction is a lasting effect of treatment and can impact the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. This review examined the impact of different levels (none/low, moderate, and high) of physical activity on sexual outcomes in breast cancer survivors.