Are prophylactic antibiotics routinely necessary in laparoscopic adnexal surgery? A multicenter cohort study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Is Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Needed for Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery? A Multicenter Cohort Study

  • By

  • Hiromi Miyata

  • Eiji Kobayashi

  • Miki Yasuda

  • Hungwu Chien

  • Masahiko Takemura

  • Tomoko Tsujie

  • Kyoka Amemiya

  • Akiko Otake

  • Toshiya Yamamoto

  • Eiji Nakatani

  • Michiko Kodama

  • Yutaka Ueda

  • October 19, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Is Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Needed for Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery? A Multicenter Cohort Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Is Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Needed for Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery? A Multicenter Cohort Study
Key MechanismsThe study compares pre-incision cefazolin with no prophylactic antibiotics and evaluates 30-day SSI incidence after laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
Target PopulationPatients included in the source article's study population.
Care SettingCare setting described in the source article.

Key Highlights

  • This multicenter retrospective cohort compared 30-day SSI incidence in patients given pre-incision cefazolin with incidence in patients given no prophylactic antibiotics.
  • Eligible procedures included laparoscopic adnexectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and salpingectomy for benign disease.
  • SSI was classified as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space pelvic infection using CDC criteria.
  • The study also assessed associations between SSI and selected patient and perioperative factors.
  • The supplied article text does not include study results, so comparative effects and associated risk factors cannot be reported.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The study defined its primary outcome as SSI within 30 days after surgery, categorized by CDC criteria as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space pelvic infection.

Management

  • The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy advises cefazolin before laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
  • ACOG and SOGC advise against routine prophylaxis for class I clean laparoscopic procedures without gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract entry, citing insufficient evidence of benefit.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The study assessed SSI incidence within 30 days after surgery as its primary outcome.
  • The study assessed age, BMI, diabetes, endometriosis, prior abdominal surgery, uterine manipulator use, operative time, and blood loss as factors associated with SSI.

Risks

  • The article identifies obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and immunocompromised status as recognized patient-related SSI risk factors.
  • The article notes concerns about excessive prophylactic antibiotic use, including antibiotic resistance, allergic reactions, and disturbances to normal microbiomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign indications were eligible. Exclusions were adnexal abscess or pelvic inflammatory disease, conversion to laparotomy, tissue retrieval through a transvaginal or small-laparotomy incision, concurrent hysteroscopy, or prophylaxis other than cefazolin.

At six hospitals, protocols specified intravenous cefazolin 1–2 g within 60 minutes before skin incision; one hospital did not routinely administer prophylactic antibiotics. The supplied text does not report comparative SSI results.

Clinical Best Practices

  • The article describes differing recommendations: the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy advises cefazolin, whereas ACOG and SOGC advise against routine prophylaxis for class I clean laparoscopic procedures without gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract entry.
  • Antibiotic use was determined by participating facility policy in this retrospective cohort.
  • The supplied text does not state that smoking, immunocompromised status, or nutritional status were uniformly documented; remove this claim unless supported by additional source text.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content