Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic biomarkers for neuroblastoma risk stratification - Scorecard - MDSpire

Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic biomarkers for neuroblastoma risk stratification

  • By

  • Lixiao Shi

  • Dixiao Zhong

  • Ruihong Tang

  • Duanfang Shao

  • Xiang Cheng

  • Zhaoxia Zhang

  • Rong Liu

  • June 15, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratios in Stratifying Neuroblastoma Risk

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNeuroblastoma
Key MechanismsPretreatment inflammatory markers including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic biomarkers.
Target PopulationPediatric patients newly diagnosed with neuroblastoma.
Care SettingCapital Center for Children’s Health, Capital Medical University.

Key Highlights

  • NLR and PLR are significant predictors of neuroblastoma risk stratification.
  • Optimal cutoff values established: NLR at 0.98 and PLR at 104.6.
  • Combined NLR-PLR model showed an AUC of 0.833 for risk discrimination.
  • Elevated NLR and PLR correlate with advanced disease stages.
  • Integration of NLR and PLR may enhance initial risk stratification.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Utilize NLR and PLR as part of the diagnostic workup for neuroblastoma.

Management

  • Incorporate NLR and PLR into risk stratification protocols to guide treatment intensity.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor NLR and PLR levels as part of ongoing assessment in neuroblastoma patients.

Risks

  • High NLR and PLR values are associated with poor prognostic indicators.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Treatment-naive pediatric patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma.

NLR and PLR may serve as cost-effective biomarkers for refining treatment strategies.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Ensure comprehensive diagnostic documentation for neuroblastoma patients.
  • Conduct molecular and cytogenetic profiling as part of the evaluation.
  • Utilize pretreatment laboratory results for accurate risk assessment.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content