Comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroereisis and osteotomy in the treatment of paediatric patients with idiopathic flexible pes planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroereisis and osteotomy in the treatment of paediatric patients with idiopathic flexible pes planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Haoyang Chen

  • Hao-Xing Lai

  • Siddarth Venkateswaran

  • Andrew Kean Seng Lim

  • James Hoi Po Hui

  • Si Heng Sharon Tan

  • February 26, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of arthroereisis versus osteotomy for treating idiopathic flexible flatfoot in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionIdiopathic flexible flatfoot (FFF) in children
Key MechanismsFFF is a complex three-dimensional deformity characterized by hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and collapse of the medial longitudinal arch; arthroereisis stabilizes the subtalar joint via synthetic implants in the sinus tarsi to correct excessive forefoot abduction and subtalar eversion
Target PopulationChildren and adolescents aged 18 years and younger with symptomatic idiopathic flexible flatfoot
Care SettingOrthopedic surgical care, including minimally invasive procedures and traditional open surgeries

Key Highlights

  • FFF accounts for over 95% of flatfoot cases in children and is typically asymptomatic but may require surgery if conservative treatments fail
  • Subtalar arthroereisis is a minimally invasive procedure gaining traction due to lower complication rates and shorter hospital stays compared to osteotomies
  • This systematic review and meta-analysis compares arthroereisis and osteotomy using radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis is based on clinical assessment of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and medial arch collapse
  • Radiographic measurements including talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, talocalcaneal angle, and talonavicular coverage angle are used to evaluate deformity

Management

  • Conservative treatments such as corrective shoes, foot orthoses, and exercise therapies are first-line for symptomatic FFF
  • Operative interventions including soft-tissue techniques, osteotomies, and subtalar arthroereisis are considered after failure of conservative management
  • Subtalar arthroereisis involves insertion of synthetic implants into the sinus tarsi to stabilize the subtalar joint and correct deformity

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Postoperative assessment includes radiographic evaluation of foot alignment and validated patient-reported outcome measures such as the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score

Risks

  • Arthroereisis is associated with lower complication rates and shorter hospital stays compared to osteotomies
  • Careful patient selection is necessary to exclude secondary causes of flatfoot and other pathologies

Patient & Prescribing Data

Children and adolescents with symptomatic idiopathic flexible flatfoot unresponsive to conservative treatment

Arthroereisis offers a minimally invasive alternative to osteotomy with potential benefits in complication rates and recovery, but evidence quality has been variable

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform thorough clinical and radiographic assessment to confirm idiopathic flexible flatfoot and exclude secondary causes
  • Initiate conservative management prior to considering surgical options
  • Select surgical technique based on patient-specific factors, deformity severity, and surgeon expertise
  • Use standardized radiographic parameters and validated PROMs for pre- and postoperative evaluation
  • Ensure multidisciplinary discussion and informed consent regarding risks and benefits of arthroereisis versus osteotomy

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content