Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer
Clinical Scorecard: Comparative Analysis of Direct In-Bore MRI-Guided Biopsy Versus Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with MRI Detected Lesions Suggestive of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)
Key Mechanisms
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enables accurate detection and localization of csPCa; targeted biopsy via direct in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB) or MRI-TRUS fusion-guided biopsy (FGB) improves detection over systematic TRUS biopsy
Target Population
Men with persistent clinical suspicion of prostate cancer despite negative TRUS biopsy and MRI-detected lesions (PI-RADS 4 or 5) ≥8 mm
Care Setting
Specialized radiology and urology centers with access to mpMRI and biopsy technologies
Key Highlights
mpMRI is recommended by EAU for men with persistent suspicion of PCa after negative TRUS biopsy due to improved detection of csPCa
MRGB offers accurate lesion targeting but is time-consuming, expensive, and less accessible; FGB is more widely available and less costly
FGB allows concurrent systematic TRUS biopsy to detect csPCa missed by targeted biopsy alone, but in this study only targeted biopsy was performed
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use mpMRI to detect and localize suspicious prostate lesions prior to biopsy
Consider targeted biopsy for lesions scored PI-RADS 4 or 5 and ≥8 mm in size
Perform biopsy in patients with prior negative TRUS biopsy but persistent clinical suspicion
Management
Select biopsy method based on lesion size, availability, and patient preference: MRGB for smaller or PI-RADS 3 lesions, FGB for larger lesions ≥8 mm
Perform targeted biopsy without anesthetics in both MRGB and FGB procedures
In FGB, use software-assisted image fusion with electromagnetic tracking and cognitive enhancement
Monitoring & Follow-up
Evaluate biopsy cores by dedicated uropathologists considering Gleason score ≥7 as clinically significant
Use PI-RADS scoring and lesion size to guide biopsy targeting and follow-up
Risks
MRGB is time-consuming (45–60 min) and expensive with limited accessibility
FGB may have registration inaccuracies due to prostate deformation and lacks needle position confirmation
Both procedures performed transrectally without anesthetics may cause patient discomfort
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with prior negative TRUS biopsy, PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions ≥8 mm on mpMRI
FGB performed by less experienced radiologists can be as accurate as MRGB for lesions ≥8 mm; patient preference influences biopsy method selection
Clinical Best Practices
Use mpMRI with PI-RADS scoring to select patients and lesions for targeted biopsy
Apply software-assisted fusion with electromagnetic tracking and cognitive enhancement for FGB
Confirm lesion localization with additional MRI sequences during MRGB and verify needle placement
Consider lesion size and PI-RADS score when choosing between MRGB and FGB
Perform biopsies without anesthetics but monitor patient comfort
Evaluate biopsy specimens with experienced uropathologists aware of biopsy method and imaging findings
by Wulphert Venderink, Marloes van der Leest, Annemarijke van Luijtelaar, Wendy J. M. van de Ven, Jurgen J. Fütterer, J. P. Michiel Sedelaar, Henkjan J. Huisman