Muscle and fat composition in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma - Scorecard - MDSpire

Muscle and fat composition in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

  • By

  • Nadine H. Abdallah

  • Hiroki Nagayama

  • Naoki Takahashi

  • Wilson Gonsalves

  • Amie Fonder

  • Angela Dispenzieri

  • David Dingli

  • Francis K. Buadi

  • Martha Q. Lacy

  • Miriam Hobbs

  • Morie A. Gertz

  • Moritz Binder

  • Prashant Kapoor

  • Rahma Warsame

  • Suzanne R. Hayman

  • Taxiarchis Kourelis

  • Yi L. Hwa

  • Yi Lin

  • Robert A. Kyle

  • S. Vincent Rajkumar

  • Stephen M. Broski

  • Shaji K. Kumar

  • December 12, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Body Composition Analysis in Patients with Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMultiple Myeloma (MM)
Key MechanismsAssessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue content and quality via 18F-FDG PET/CT at L3 vertebral level to evaluate prognostic impact
Target PopulationNewly diagnosed adult patients with multiple myeloma
Care SettingOncology and hematology clinical settings with access to PET/CT imaging

Key Highlights

  • Sarcopenia and adipose tissue distribution assessed by CT imaging have variable prognostic impacts in hematologic malignancies including MM.
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis allows quantitative and qualitative body composition analysis in MM patients.
  • Body composition parameters such as skeletal muscle index (SMI) and adipose tissue indices are calculated using standardized CT attenuation thresholds and normalized for height.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging within 3 months prior to or within 1 month of treatment initiation for body composition analysis in MM.
  • Perform single-slice cross-sectional CT image analysis at L3 vertebral level for muscle and fat compartment segmentation.
  • Classify sarcopenia using sex-specific SMI cutoffs from literature or population medians.

Management

  • Incorporate body composition parameters alongside established prognostic factors to inform risk stratification.
  • Consider muscle and fat composition in treatment planning and supportive care to potentially improve outcomes.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to baseline body composition parameters.
  • Use standardized statistical methods (Kaplan–Meier, Cox models) for outcome analysis.

Risks

  • Recognize variability in sarcopenia definitions and thresholds may affect prognostic interpretations.
  • Account for heterogeneity in patient populations and treatment regimens when evaluating body composition impact.

Patient & Prescribing Data

341 patients with newly diagnosed MM, median age 65, 66% male, majority receiving novel agent induction therapy

54% underwent transplantation; body composition analysis performed prior to or shortly after treatment initiation to assess prognostic significance

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use semi-automated software with manual correction for accurate segmentation of muscle and adipose tissue on CT images.
  • Apply sex-specific and BMI-adjusted cutoffs for defining sarcopenia to improve prognostic relevance.
  • Integrate body composition analysis into comprehensive patient assessment to guide personalized management.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content