Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study
Clinical Scorecard: The Enhanced Role of Systematic Biopsy in Men Suspected of Prostate Cancer Undergoing Biparametric MRI-Guided Biopsy: A Multi-Center Validation Study
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Prostate Cancer (PCa)
Key Mechanisms
Use of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) to guide targeted biopsy (TBx) and evaluate the need for additional systematic biopsy (SBx) to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
Target Population
Men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI.
Care Setting
Multi-center clinical settings with MRI and biopsy capabilities.
Key Highlights
Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) offers a simplified, contrast-free imaging protocol to detect and localize prostate cancer lesions.
MRI-targeted biopsy (TBx) shows superiority over systematic biopsy (SBx) but omitting SBx risks missing 10-16% of clinically significant prostate cancers.
A nomogram based on MRI volumetric parameters and clinical data was developed and validated to guide when SBx should be added to TBx.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Perform biparametric MRI using IMPROD protocol for men with suspected prostate cancer.
Use MRI-targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions identified on bpMRI.
Consider systematic biopsy in addition to targeted biopsy to reduce risk of missing csPCa, especially in cases with smaller lesions or large prostate volume.
Management
Use cognitive targeting or MRI-TRUS fusion platforms for biopsy targeting.
Perform 12-core systematic biopsy following targeted biopsy to maximize detection of csPCa.
Apply multivariable models incorporating MRI volumetric parameters to decide on the necessity of systematic biopsy.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Evaluate biopsy results using Gleason grading system by experienced uropathologists blinded to MRI findings.
Monitor rates of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer detection in both TBx and SBx cores.
Risks
Systematic biopsy increases risks of infection, bleeding, and pain due to additional core sampling.
Higher detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer with SBx may lead to overtreatment.
Omitting SBx risks missing 10-16% of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Men with suspicious biparametric MRI findings (Likert/PIRADS score > 2) undergoing prostate biopsy.
Combining TBx with SBx improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer; decision to omit SBx should be guided by MRI volumetric parameters and clinical risk models.
Clinical Best Practices
Use biparametric MRI protocols without contrast to reduce costs and increase accessibility.
Ensure MRI images are reported by experienced radiologists and centrally reviewed for consistency.
Perform both targeted and systematic biopsies to optimize detection of clinically significant prostate cancer until predictive models are validated.
Use volumetric analysis of prostate and lesion size to inform biopsy strategy.
Maintain blinded pathology review to avoid bias in Gleason grading.
by Ugo Falagario, Ivan Jambor, Pekka Taimen, Kari T. Syvänen, Esa Kähkönen, Harri Merisaari, Ileana Montoya Perez, Juha Knaapila, Aida Steiner, Janne Verho, Ashutosh Tewari, Hannu J. Aronen, Giuseppe Carrieri, Peter J. Boström, Otto Ettala