Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: evolving practice patterns from the national cancer database (2004–2020) - Scorecard - MDSpire

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: evolving practice patterns from the national cancer database (2004–2020)

  • By

  • Jonathan J. Shih

  • Bhav Jain

  • Rohan Patel

  • Urvish Jain

  • Miranda Lam

  • Fumiko Chino

  • Manali I. Patel

  • Edward Christopher Dee

  • Erqi Pollom

  • Gordon Li

  • Kekoa Taparra

  • August 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Trends in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Insights from the National Cancer Database (2004–2020)

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBrain metastases (BM) in cancer patients
Key MechanismsStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as radiotherapy modalities for BM
Target PopulationAdult patients (≥18 years) with brain metastases from various primary cancers in the United States
Care SettingHospital-based oncology care facilities accredited by the American College of Surgeons and American Cancer Society

Key Highlights

  • SRS offers comparable survival outcomes to WBRT with reduced neurocognitive toxicity, leading to increased preference since 2016.
  • Disparities in SRS utilization exist related to race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance coverage, geographic location, and healthcare access.
  • Medicaid expansion and institutional factors may influence access to SRS, with marginalized populations more likely to receive WBRT and experience treatment delays.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to define SRS and WBRT treatment modalities based on radiotherapy fractionation and technique.
  • Classify brain metastases using clinical and sociodemographic data including race, ethnicity, income, education, insurance, and comorbidity scores.

Management

  • Consider SRS for patients with limited brain metastases or select extensive disease cases to reduce neurotoxicity.
  • WBRT remains a treatment option for extensive brain metastases but is associated with higher neurocognitive risks.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor treatment patterns and access disparities over time using comprehensive databases like the National Cancer Database.
  • Assess sociodemographic factors and healthcare access to identify and address disparities in treatment utilization.

Risks

  • WBRT is associated with higher neurocognitive toxicity compared to SRS.
  • Disparities in access to SRS may lead to delayed treatment and worse outcomes in marginalized populations.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adult patients with brain metastases from twelve common primary cancers treated with radiotherapy between 2004 and 2020 in the United States.

SRS utilization has increased over time but remains unevenly distributed due to socioeconomic, racial, and geographic disparities; patients from marginalized groups are less likely to receive SRS.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize SRS preferentially for eligible patients with limited brain metastases to minimize neurocognitive side effects.
  • Incorporate detailed sociodemographic data including disaggregated racial and ethnic categories to better understand and address treatment disparities.
  • Leverage healthcare policy changes such as Medicaid expansion to improve access to advanced treatments like SRS.
  • Ensure treatment decisions consider patient comorbidities, insurance status, and proximity to specialized centers offering SRS.
  • Continuously monitor national treatment trends and disparities using large oncology databases to inform equitable care delivery.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content