Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography: results of a single-center randomized trial - Scorecard - MDSpire

Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography: results of a single-center randomized trial

  • By

  • Maria Bosserdt

  • Viktoria Wieske

  • Fabian Knebel

  • Mahmoud M. A. Mohamed

  • Sarah Feger

  • Marc Dewey

  • Eva Schönenberger

  • February 17, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Comparative Analysis of Patient Satisfaction: Coronary CT Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in a Randomized Single-Center Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSuspected coronary artery disease (CAD)
Key MechanismsNoninvasive coronary CT angiography (CTA) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for CAD diagnosis
Target PopulationPatients with suspected CAD and clinical indication for ICA, with low-to-intermediate pretest probability
Care SettingSingle-center clinical setting with randomized assignment to CT or ICA

Key Highlights

  • CTA is increasingly implemented for ruling out CAD in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability.
  • This randomized study uniquely compares patient satisfaction and preference between coronary CT and invasive coronary angiography.
  • Patient satisfaction was assessed using a validated questionnaire evaluating preparation, comfort, pain, and overall experience.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use coronary CT angiography primarily for patients with suspected CAD and low-to-intermediate pretest probability.
  • Confirm positive CT findings with invasive coronary angiography before treatment initiation.

Management

  • Provide thorough explanations about imaging tests to patients prior to procedures.
  • Use noninvasive CT as initial evaluation to potentially improve patient experience.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Assess patient satisfaction and pain levels post-procedure using standardized questionnaires.
  • Follow up with patients to evaluate their experience and willingness to undergo repeat examinations.

Risks

  • Consider exclusion criteria such as multiple positive ischemia tests, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction signs, inability to consent, or breath-holding limitations.
  • Be aware that invasive angiography involves puncture and potential discomfort without sedation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with suspected CAD referred for ICA and randomized to either coronary CT or ICA.

Patients randomized to CT had a more favorable experience; pain and comfort levels were systematically assessed to inform patient-centered care.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Randomize patients to CT or ICA when clinically indicated to objectively assess patient satisfaction.
  • Use validated multi-language patient preference questionnaires to capture comprehensive patient feedback.
  • Incorporate imaging explanations and visual demonstrations to improve patient understanding and comfort.
  • Measure pain using visual analogue scales and assess willingness for repeat procedures to guide clinical decision-making.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content