NAFLD vs MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)—Why the Need for a Change of Nomenclature? - Scorecard - MDSpire

NAFLD vs MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)—Why the Need for a Change of Nomenclature?

  • By

  • Amalia Gastaldelli

  • Philip N Newsome

  • February 19, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Reassessing Nomenclature: Transitioning from NAFLD to MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMetabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Key MechanismsHepatic triglyceride accumulation driven by insulin resistance, excess free fatty acids from adipose tissue lipolysis, and metabolic dysfunction
Target PopulationIndividuals with hepatic steatosis and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor
Care SettingSpecialist hepatology and metabolic clinics; primary care for risk factor identification

Key Highlights

  • MASLD replaces NAFLD to emphasize metabolic origin and reduce stigma by removing 'nonalcoholic' and 'fatty' terms.
  • Diagnosis requires liver steatosis plus one or more metabolic risk factors; excludes excessive alcohol intake above defined limits.
  • New category MetALD recognizes combined metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease, associated with increased mortality.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnose MASLD by presence of hepatic steatosis and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor.
  • Exclude individuals with alcohol consumption ≥30 g/day for men and ≥20 g/day for women from MASLD diagnosis.
  • Liver biopsy required to diagnose steatohepatitis (MASH) showing steatosis, ballooning, and inflammation.

Management

  • Focus on addressing metabolic risk factors including obesity, dysglycemia, and dyslipidemia.
  • Consider insulin resistance as a therapeutic target to reduce hepatic lipid accumulation.
  • Recognize MetALD patients for tailored management due to combined metabolic and alcohol-related risks.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Case-finding for advanced fibrosis recommended in high-risk groups such as patients with diabetes and persistently elevated liver enzymes.
  • Routine mass population screening for MASLD not currently recommended due to lack of cost-effectiveness.

Risks

  • Presence of metabolic syndrome traits increases risk of severe fibrosis, liver-related morbidity, and mortality.
  • Excess alcohol intake in MetALD increases all-cause mortality.
  • Advanced fibrosis correlates with worse liver-related outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with hepatic steatosis and metabolic dysfunction, including those with diabetes and obesity

Insulin therapy may reduce liver fat; managing insulin resistance and metabolic risk factors is key to treatment

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use the MASLD nomenclature to improve patient communication and reduce stigma.
  • Screen high-risk patients (e.g., diabetes, metabolic syndrome) for advanced fibrosis rather than general population screening.
  • Incorporate assessment of alcohol intake to differentiate MASLD from MetALD for appropriate management.
  • Employ multidisciplinary approaches targeting metabolic dysfunction to prevent progression to MASH and fibrosis.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content