From coordinated services to learning mental health systems: advancing mental healthcare for the 21st century - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Building Learning Mental Health Systems to Improve Care in the 21st Century: From Coordinated Services to Continuous Learning

  • By

  • Jesse T Young

  • Craig Cumming

  • October 10, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Building Learning Mental Health Systems to Improve Care in the 21st Century: From Coordinated Services to Continuous Learning

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Building Learning Mental Health Systems to Improve Care in the 21st Century
Key MechanismsFragmented, siloed services can produce gaps, obstacles to access, inequities, and accountability concerns. A systems approach brings services together as an interdependent network with shared goals and governance, integrated infrastructure, and common information, policy, and evaluation frameworks.
Target PopulationPopulation described in the source article.
Care SettingCare setting described in the source article.

Key Highlights

  • The editorial calls for mental health systems to move beyond coordinated services toward integrated, person-centered systems.
  • Lived and living experience should inform the design, delivery, and evaluation of mental health services and systems.
  • The editorial states that inadequate service-user engagement and retention represent a service or system failure when users' needs remain unmet.
  • Fragmented services are associated in the editorial with gaps, access obstacles, inequities, and accountability concerns; integrated system organization remains aspirational in nearly every country and is almost entirely absent across many low- and middle-income countries.
  • The editorial emphasizes inclusion and the value of lived experience expertise in informing research and the development, delivery, and evaluation of services and systems.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

    • Embed lived and living experience in mental health system design, research, service delivery, and evaluation.
    • Develop integrated, person-centered systems with shared goals and governance, integrated infrastructure, and common information, policy, and evaluation frameworks.

    Monitoring & Follow-up

    • Include outcome measurement and evaluation in mental health system design and align definitions of success with lived experience.

    Risks

    • The editorial describes fragmented services and gaps, obstacles to access, inequities, and accountability concerns.
    • The editorial states that adverse effects on service-user engagement and experience, treatment outcomes, and service efficiency and complexity have been documented.

    Patient & Prescribing Data

    People living with mental health challenges, including those with contact with services and people with lived experience expertise; families and loved ones are also identified as central to the purpose of care.

    The editorial does not provide medication or prescribing guidance. It emphasizes person-centered care and the use of lived experience expertise in informing mental health services and systems.

    Clinical Best Practices

    • Treat lived experience expertise—the knowledge and skills developed through lived experience—as a source that can inform research and the development, delivery, and evaluation of services.
    • Recognize agency, autonomy, and inclusion when designing systems for the people they are intended to serve.
    • Recognize inadequate service-user engagement and retention as a service or system failure when users' needs remain unmet.
    • Align prevention, access, care delivery, outcome measurement, evaluation, and definitions of success with lived experience.

    Related Resources & Content

      Original Source(s)

      Related Content