Evaluating the Antitumor Effects of Tricyclic Medications: A Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine, Amitriptyline, and Imipramine
By
Joos Berghausen
Eric Glasgow
Tinatin I. Brelidze
July 2, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating the Antitumor Effects of Tricyclic Medications: A Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine, Amitriptyline, and Imipramine
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Antitumor effects of tricyclic medications
Key Mechanisms Inhibition of cancer cell growth and migration
Target Population Patients with breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and melanoma
Care Setting Oncology and pharmacology research
Key Highlights
Chlorpromazine (CPZ) demonstrated the strongest antitumorigenic effects across breast cancer and neuroblastoma cell lines. Amitriptyline (AmiT) showed intermediate effects, while Imipramine (ImiP) had the weakest inhibition of cancer cell growth. All three drugs failed to inhibit tumor growth in melanoma (A375) xenografts. In wound-healing assays, all drugs impaired migration in breast cancer and neuroblastoma cells but not in melanoma cells. The study supports the potential repurposing of FDA-approved tricyclic drugs for cancer treatment.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Evaluate cancer type and stage when considering tricyclic medications for treatment.
Management
Consider chlorpromazine and amitriptyline for breast cancer and neuroblastoma treatment.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Monitor tumor growth response in patients treated with tricyclic medications.
Risks
Assess potential side effects of tricyclic medications in oncology patients.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and melanoma
Tricyclic medications may address both psychiatric comorbidities and cancer-related symptoms.
Clinical Best Practices
Utilize comparative studies to evaluate the antitumorigenic properties of tricyclic drugs. Incorporate patient mental health considerations when prescribing tricyclic medications.
Related Resources & Content