Impact of different metal artifact reduction techniques in photon-counting computed tomography head and neck scans in patients with dental hardware - Scorecard - MDSpire

Impact of different metal artifact reduction techniques in photon-counting computed tomography head and neck scans in patients with dental hardware

  • By

  • Fabian Bernhard Pallasch

  • Alexander Rau

  • Marco Reisert

  • Stephan Rau

  • Thierno Diallo

  • Thomas Stein

  • Sebastian Faby

  • Fabian Bamberg

  • Jakob Weiss

  • November 16, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Effects of Various Metal Artifact Reduction Methods on Photon-Counting CT Scans of the Head and Neck in Patients with Dental Implants

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMetal artifacts in CT imaging caused by dental metallic implants
Key MechanismsPhoton starvation, photon scattering, beam hardening causing streaks and shadows adjacent to implants
Target PopulationPatients with dental restorations and/or non-removable metallic implants undergoing craniofacial CT imaging
Care SettingRadiology departments performing photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) scans

Key Highlights

  • Metal artifacts in CT imaging impair diagnostic accuracy by obscuring relevant findings such as abscesses, fractures, or malignancies.
  • Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) enables direct photon counting and energy measurement, allowing advanced artifact reduction techniques.
  • Combination of iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) and high keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (140 keV) on PCD-CT improves subjective and objective image quality.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use PCD-CT imaging for patients with dental implants requiring craniofacial CT to improve image quality.
  • Apply qualitative assessment of artifact severity and anatomical delineation using standardized Likert scales.

Management

  • Implement iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) algorithms optimized for PCD-CT spectra to reduce beam hardening and sinogram artifacts.
  • Utilize virtual monoenergetic imaging at high energy levels (140 keV) to further reduce metal artifacts.
  • Combine iMAR with 140 keV monoenergetic reconstruction for optimal artifact reduction.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Perform blinded, independent qualitative image assessments by radiologists to evaluate artifact severity and anatomical delineation.
  • Monitor image quality improvements with each reconstruction method to guide clinical imaging protocols.

Risks

  • Consider contraindications for CT imaging such as iodine contrast allergy, renal impairment, and thyroid dysfunction before scanning.
  • Be aware that metal artifacts may still obscure findings despite reduction techniques; clinical correlation remains essential.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults (≥18 years) with dental hardware undergoing contrast-enhanced craniofacial PCD-CT imaging for clinical indications (e.g., oropharyngeal carcinoma, abscesses, lymph node metastasis).

Use of iMAR and high keV monoenergetic reconstructions on PCD-CT improves visualization of anatomy adjacent to dental implants, potentially enhancing diagnostic confidence.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Ensure patient eligibility by screening for contraindications to CT and contrast agents.
  • Acquire PCD-CT scans in portal-venous phase with body weight-adapted contrast dosing.
  • Reconstruct images using standard (60 keV), high keV (140 keV), iMAR, and combined iMAR + 140 keV techniques for comparative evaluation.
  • Use iterative metal artifact reduction algorithms specifically optimized for PCD-CT spectra.
  • Perform multi-reader qualitative assessments to validate image quality improvements.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content