Dual-layer dual-energy CT-derived pulmonary perfusion for the differentiation of acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluation of Pulmonary Perfusion via Dual-Layer Dual-Energy CT for Distinguishing Acute Pulmonary Embolism from Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

  • By

  • Roman Johannes Gertz

  • Felix Gerhardt

  • Michael Pienn

  • Simon Lennartz

  • Jan Robert Kröger

  • Liliana Caldeira

  • Lenhard Pennig

  • Thomas Henning Schömig

  • Nils Große Hokamp

  • David Maintz

  • Stephan Rosenkranz

  • Alexander Christian Bunck

  • November 3, 2023

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Pulmonary Perfusion via Dual-Layer Dual-Energy CT for Distinguishing Acute Pulmonary Embolism from Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAcute pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
Key MechanismsPulmonary perfusion abnormalities detected by dual-energy CT (DECT) through iodine density mapping reflecting pulmonary blood flow; CTEPH involves maintained perfusion via systemic-to-pulmonary collaterals unlike acute PE
Target PopulationPatients with suspected acute PE or CTEPH undergoing CT pulmonary angiography
Care SettingHospital radiology and cardiopulmonary diagnostic centers

Key Highlights

  • CTEPH is a rare but serious sequela of acute PE characterized by persistent pulmonary hypertension and specific imaging signs after ≥3 months of anticoagulation.
  • Dual-energy CT enables visualization and quantification of pulmonary perfusion defects by mapping iodine uptake, aiding differentiation between acute PE and CTEPH.
  • Distinct perfusion patterns on DECT—patchy, wedge-shaped hypoattenuation in CTEPH with maintained flow via collaterals versus acute PE—can improve diagnostic accuracy.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use right heart catheterization, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, and angiography to confirm CTEPH after ≥3 months of anticoagulation.
  • Employ CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the key imaging modality to rule out suspected acute PE.
  • Assess morphological CTPA features such as laminated thrombi, vessel narrowing, webs, and post-stenotic dilatation to identify chronic thromboembolism.
  • Utilize dual-energy CT iodine density overlay maps to visualize and quantify pulmonary perfusion defects for differentiation between acute PE and CTEPH.

Management

  • Initiate therapeutic anticoagulation for acute PE and continue for at least 3 months before confirming CTEPH diagnosis.
  • Consider expert consensus diagnosis integrating imaging and hemodynamic data for CTEPH management planning.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor pulmonary artery pressures via right heart catheterization in suspected CTEPH.
  • Repeat imaging with V/Q scintigraphy and CTPA to assess disease progression or resolution.

Risks

  • Delayed diagnosis of CTEPH due to subtle imaging features can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.
  • Radiation exposure considerations with multi-phase DECT imaging; single-phase dual-layer DECT reduces radiation burden.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with suspected acute PE or CTEPH undergoing diagnostic imaging

Accurate differentiation between acute PE and CTEPH via DECT imaging can guide appropriate anticoagulation duration and further therapeutic interventions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Exclude patients with prior PE or known chronic thromboembolic disease when diagnosing acute PE to avoid misclassification.
  • Use single-phase dual-layer dual-energy CT to semiautomatically detect and quantify pulmonary perfusion abnormalities, minimizing radiation exposure.
  • Interpret DECT iodine maps in conjunction with morphological CTPA features and clinical data for comprehensive assessment.
  • Apply expert multidisciplinary consensus for final diagnosis of CTEPH incorporating hemodynamic and imaging findings.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content